There is an example of how you can configure solaris using arguments to
configure with external apr and apr-util in build/pkg/buildpkg.sh
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:51 PM, csross wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It was suggested that I try and use apr 1.3.9 and apu 1.3.9 to try and stop
> the problem with gr
Hi,
It was suggested that I try and use apr 1.3.9 and apu 1.3.9 to try and stop
the problem with graceful restarts and processes being stuck in "G" state if
you have more than 1 listener (ie) port 80 and port 443. I have been trying
the newer versions of apache and I still have that problem with
Mikhail T. wrote:
> On 27.12.2011 08:24, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>> Some modules in 2.3 require the apr-util crypto API. These
>> won't work with older apr-util versions.
> Oh, Ok -- so a module may just not be built, if apr(-util) is too old at
> compile time. But if it is available, it is
> full
On 27.12.2011 08:24, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Some modules in 2.3 require the apr-util crypto API. These
won't work with older apr-util versions.
Oh, Ok -- so a module may just not be built, if apr(-util) is too old at
compile time. But if it is available, it is fully-featured, right? In
other wor
Mikhail T. wrote:
> On 27.12.2011 02:12, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>> You can still run httpd 2.3 with APR-UTIL 1.3.x, but you will miss some
>> features then.
>
> Will the features be missing from Apache itself? If so, is there a list of
> what's not available in the httpd?
>
> We are using the
On 27.12.2011 02:12, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
You can still run httpd 2.3 with APR-UTIL 1.3.x, but you will miss some
features then.
Will the features be missing from Apache itself? If so, is there a list
of what's not available in the httpd?
We are using the 2.2.x branch and I prefer compilin
thanks for correction.
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 8:12 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>
> Michael Felt wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am trying to configure and make httpd 3.16 beta on AIX and I see there
> is a difference in the way apr is handled.
> > However, I am confused about the versioning number
Michael Felt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to configure and make httpd 3.16 beta on AIX and I see there is a
> difference in the way apr is handled.
> However, I am confused about the versioning numbering?
>
> ./configure --with-included-apr ... says apr is version 1.4.5 while if I
> chec
Hi all,
I am trying to configure and make httpd 3.16 beta on AIX and I see there is
a difference in the way apr is handled. However, I am confused about the
versioning numbering?
./configure --with-included-apr ... says apr is version 1.4.5 while if I
check the apr mail list, it seems they are t
