> Justin wrote ( RE: Apache STATUS files )...
>
> Oh, I hate to get more email that I just delete as soon as it comes in
>
> Does anyone actually read these things though?
Yes.
Another thing I have been oogling is proxy_http.c line 946 where the HTTP
response is passed to proxy output filters:
if (ap_pass_brigade(r->output_filters, bb) != APR_SUCCESS) {
/* Ack! Phbtt! Die! User aborted! */
p_conn->close = 1; /* this causes socket close below */
finis
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 07:16:02AM +, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:38:06PM +, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:05:21PM +, Joe Orton wrote:
> > > Colm, can you try running the apr/test/sendfile binary with your
> > > machines?
> >
> > It was one o
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 10:54:53AM +, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote:
..
> telnet [v6addr] 80
> GET / HTTP/1.1
> Host: madeup.tld
>
>
Have you verified with tcpdump/ethereal etc that this hang is because
the server is not sending the packets? What does netstat -t show for
this connection?
That tes
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 11:30:29AM +, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 10:54:53AM +, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote:
> ..
> > telnet [v6addr] 80
> > GET / HTTP/1.1
> > Host: madeup.tld
> >
> >
>
> Have you verified with tcpdump/ethereal etc that this hang is because
> the server is no
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 12:58:48PM +, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote:
> I'm using vanilla 2.4.18, from Debian kernel-source-2.4.18 , one machine
> has the broadcom bcm5700 module, and the the other has the intel
> e1000 module.
O.k., more testing, I've tried it out on another box, which has
a 3com n
Colm MacCárthaigh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 12:58:48PM +, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote:
> > I'm using vanilla 2.4.18, from Debian kernel-source-2.4.18
> , one machine
> > has the broadcom bcm5700 module, and the the other has the intel
> > e1000 module.
>
> O.k.
Eric Gillespie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> tmp=export_files_unsorted.txt; rm -f $tmp && touch $tmp; for dir in /usr/lo
> cal/apache2/src/include /usr/local/apache2/src/os/S_DIR PR_INCLUDEDIR PU_INCL
> UDEDIR /usr/local/apache2/src/modules/http; do find $dir -maxdepth 1 -type f
> -name '*.h'
* Eric Gillespie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> Eric Gillespie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > tmp=export_files_unsorted.txt; rm -f $tmp && touch $tmp; for dir in /usr/lo
> > cal/apache2/src/include /usr/local/apache2/src/os/S_DIR PR_INCLUDEDIR PU_INCL
> > UDEDIR /usr/local/apache2/src/modules/
To summarize some off-list dicussion - the kernel guys have said that
using sendfile on IPv6 sockets may trigger bugs in cards which do
hardware TCP checksumming for card/driver/OS combinations which support
that. (since the cards have to know about IPv6, and that probably
doesn't get tested much).
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 04:17:53PM +, Joe Orton wrote:
> To summarize some off-list dicussion - the kernel guys have said that
> using sendfile on IPv6 sockets may trigger bugs in cards which do
> hardware TCP checksumming for card/driver/OS combinations which support
> that. (since the cards h
--On Thursday, December 5, 2002 11:35 AM +0200 "Tikka, Sami"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Should the check for conn->aborted flag be added into proxy_http.c?
No, I'd prefer not. The core_output_filter should be returning the
error code. The fact that it is returning APR_SUCCESS when there was
Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Unfortunately, I did not apply the patch to APACHE_2_0_BRANCH until
> last night. Please update server/listen.c to pick up the fix and
> report back. IMHO we shouldn't release 2.0.44 without this issue
> resolved. While I'm "sure" the patch fixes it, i
Hi,
So many commits lately I'm having trouble keeping track.
If I were to tag 2_0_44_PRE1 now, would I be leaving
anything important out (apart from the IPv6 TCP_CORK
fix)? Is there more reverting/fixing to do on the aaa
front (Japanese docs)?
Thanks,
Sander
* Sander Striker wrote:
> So many commits lately I'm having trouble keeping track.
sorry ;-)
> Is there more reverting/fixing to do on the aaa
> front (Japanese docs)?
I won't touch the japanese files, since I would produce weird results, that
I can't verify.
However, if nobody else does the r
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002 20:11:41 +0100, Sander Striker wrote:
>So many commits lately I'm having trouble keeping track.
>If I were to tag 2_0_44_PRE1 now, would I be leaving
>anything important out (apart from the IPv6 TCP_CORK
>fix)? Is there more reverting/fixing to do on the aaa
>front (Japanese do
16 matches
Mail list logo
