Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
I've noticed we include the RELEASE file in the release tarball. I
don't believe mod_perl or apreq do. Is this intentional ?
Appologies, this was not correct. Too many directories of this thing.
--
END
On Wed, 5 Oct 2005, Steve Hay wrote:
Joe Schaefer wrote:
[ ... ]
IMO submit a tested patch to libapreq's Param.xs that does this
(where MY_PLATFORM is suitably defined to match the above):
#ifdef MY_PLATFORM
#undef PerlLIO_link
#define PerlLIO_link(oldname, newname) win32_link(oldname,
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Folks,
should we restore the missing feature to actually help folks create
their first cert/key with a support/ .sh/.bat file to generate a key
and a cert?
No, I think we should give a URL to our online documentation that tells
you how.
-Paul
Paul Querna wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Folks,
should we restore the missing feature to actually help folks create
their first cert/key with a support/ .sh/.bat file to generate a key
and a cert?
No, I think we should give a URL to our online documentation that tells
you how.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Folks,
should we restore the missing feature to actually help folks create
their first cert/key with a support/ .sh/.bat file to generate a key
and a cert?
No, I think we should give a URL to our online
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 01:10:18AM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
should we restore the missing feature to actually help folks create
their first cert/key with a support/ .sh/.bat file to generate a key
and a cert?
I wouldn't mind that. Alternatively adding a version of sign.sh to
On 10/3/05, Eric Covener [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/15/05, Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/25/05, Eric Covener [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've attached a patch that resolves the hostname in the URI and hands
that off separately to ap_proxy_checkproxyblock().
Any comments
måndag 03 oktober 2005 18.35 skrev Paul Querna:
Oden Eriksson wrote:
Hi.
I don't know if this is the right forum for this question but I found no
info elsewhere. I simply wonder when 2.1.x is going to be dubbed stable?
See our versioning file:
Attached is a patch for bug 36816. The balancer_manager interface
offered by mod_proxy_balancer doesn't work properly if a worker name
contains a port number.
E.g. if I have configured a cluster as:
Proxy balancer://testcluster
BalancerMember http://server-one.mydomain.com:1234
This is my period reminder email that mod_mbox is regularly crashing on
ajax. Nothing more to add from my previous notes.
Joshua.
In order to continue with our efforts to make http a truly flexible
multiprotocol server, we need to start distinguishing a few elements.
The MPM core engine, the connection rec and core filters are (or should
have been) request_rec agnostic. The act of establishing a connection
has nothing to
found apr source: /local0/asf/apr-1.2
found apr-util source: /local0/asf/aprutil-1.2
copying build files
rebuilding srclib/pcre/configure
rebuilding include/ap_config_auto.h.in
configure.in:317: warning: AC_RUN_IFELSE was called before AC_AIX
autoconf/specific.m4:427: AC_AIX is expanded from...
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 03:04:52PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Could whoever introduced this determine how to properly fix it?
My bad, fixed now.
--
Colm MacCárthaighPublic Key: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Folks,
it seems that the #apr channel (a great place to hang out) seems to
be detoured frequently into off-topic other-project traffic (including
a bogus redirect of [EMAIL PROTECTED] commits at that channel.)
since nothing else quite fit, and I sure didn't want alot of end user
traffic, a
On Wednesday 05 October 2005 21:57, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Folks,
it seems that the #apr channel (a great place to hang out) seems to
be detoured frequently into off-topic other-project traffic (including
a bogus redirect of [EMAIL PROTECTED] commits at that channel.)
since
Nick Kew wrote:
I'm not really convinced we need another channel. We already have
#apache-modules, which deals with httpd (as well as module) hacking,
and has largely the same membership as #apr (and modest traffic -
we don't generally have a problem keeping helpdesk traffic to #apache:-)
flood STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2004-11-24 19:36:41 -0500 (Wed, 24 Nov 2004) $]
Release:
1.0: Released July 23, 2002
milestone-03: Tagged January 16, 2002
ASF-transfer: Released July 17, 2001
httpd-test/perl-framework STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2004-11-24 19:36:41 -0500 (Wed, 24 Nov 2004) $]
Stuff to do:
* finish the t/TEST exit code issue (ORed with 0x2C if
framework failed)
* change existing tests that frob the
APACHE 2.1 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2005-06-30 16:42:43 -0400 (Thu, 30 Jun 2005) $]
The current version of this file can be found at:
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/STATUS
Documentation status is maintained
On Oct 5, 2005, at 7:04 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Before I consider backporting for 2.1-dev, I'd very much appreciate
if some of the event mpm ap_process_http_async_connection developers
would confirm that the mechanisms behave the way I expect them to.
IIUC, the event pollset will
20 matches
Mail list logo
