Re: mod_python 3.2.7 available for testing

2006-02-06 Thread Volodya
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 09:10:15PM -0500, Jim Gallacher wrote: Mod_python 3.2.7 tarball is available for test. Here's hoping this will be to final time we need your help testing before the official release. 3.2.7 adds a fix for the connection read issue that was causing problems on

Re: mod_python 3.2.7 available for testing

2006-02-06 Thread Wim Heirman
+1 Fedora Core 4, Linux 2.6.15, Apache 2.0.54, Python 2.4.1 Jim Gallacher wrote: Mod_python 3.2.7 tarball is available for test. Here's hoping this will be to final time we need your help testing before the official release. 3.2.7 adds a fix for the connection read issue that was causing

Re: mod_python 3.2.7 available for testing

2006-02-06 Thread Sébastien Arnaud
Hi, I hate to be the first one to report an issue with 3.2.7 tarball... It might be related to my lack of knowledge (just joined the dev list a few days ago), but here it is: It is failing during the configure process... [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/mod_python-3.2.7 $ ./configure --with-apxs=/usr/

Re: mod_python 3.2.7 available for testing

2006-02-06 Thread Sébastien Arnaud
Hi Graham, I am using: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/mod_python-3.2.7 $ bash --version GNU bash, version 3.1.7(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Copyright (C) 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc. I will look at if I can find later the BASH bug you are referring to. I had the feeling that it was not

bash bug (was Re: mod_python 3.2.7 available for testing)

2006-02-06 Thread Jim Gallacher
A couple of thoughts on this issue. According to the gentoo bug report quoted below, the problem in configure.in is the double backslash escape sequence in the line: MP_VERSION=`echo $MP_VERSION | sed s/\\//g` Changing this to: MP_VERSION=`echo $MP_VERSION | sed s/\//g` fixes it for bash

Re: bash bug (was Re: mod_python 3.2.7 available for testing)

2006-02-06 Thread Deron Meranda
On 2/6/06, Jim Gallacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A couple of thoughts on this issue. According to the gentoo bug report quoted below, the problem in configure.in is the double backslash escape sequence in the line: MP_VERSION=`echo $MP_VERSION | sed s/\\//g` Changing this to:

Re: mod_python 3.2.7 available for testing

2006-02-06 Thread Nick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 +1 Ubuntu 5.10 Breezy (amd64), Apache 2.0.54-worker, Python 2.4.2 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFD5/mTv4zJ7LQ+i84RAofQAKCb4ptmhPQa5QKRV/2sga60Xz4oAACcDygf IB8UDE0zlcUr+I16DWbQ09U= =WrUY -END PGP

Re: bash bug (was Re: mod_python 3.2.7 available for testing)

2006-02-06 Thread Sébastien Arnaud
Hi, I would like to report: +1 Gentoo 2005.1 (amd64), Apache 2.0.55-prefork, Python 2.4.2 After replacing the troubling line (line 3038, configure): from: MP_VERSION=`echo $MP_VERSION | sed s/\\//g` to (Deron's 1st suggestion): MP_VERSION=`echo $MP_VERSION | sed 's///g' ` I guess now it's up

Hooking handler with ap_hook_map_to_storage().

2006-02-06 Thread Graham Dumpleton
Grisha I have a really obscure question for you. Was there a specific reason that mod_python did not allow a handler to be hooked using ap_hook_map_to_storage()? I know that the reasons for wanting to do this would be very limited, such as if you wanted to implement some sort of equivalent to

Re: 2.07-rc4 available for testing

2006-02-06 Thread Fred Moyer
Randy Kobes wrote: On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, Joe Schaefer wrote: Please download, test, and report back on the following candidate tarball: http://people.apache.org/~joes/libapreq2-2.07-rc4.tar.gz Sorry for the delay ... This builds and tests successfully, including the perl glue, on both: -

Re: svn commit: r374821 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES buildconf server/Makefile.in

2006-02-06 Thread Joe Orton
On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 02:41:06AM -, William Rowe wrote: Author: wrowe Date: Fri Feb 3 18:41:02 2006 New Revision: 374821 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=374821view=rev Log: Solaris build proposal; don't fail on missing .h files within a VPATH build, and don't test trees

Re: mod_ssl 5s delay

2006-02-06 Thread Joe Orton
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 05:30:17PM +0100, Oden Eriksson wrote: For some reason I get a 5 seconds delay for each ssl access, I get it with 2.2.0 and 2.2.x head. I just can't figure out what is wrong. It worked fine with 2.0.x. Check your SSLRandomSeed settings? strace -t a child to see where

mod_proxy buffering small chunks

2006-02-06 Thread Alan Gutierrez
I'd like to use mod_proxy to proxy a stock ticker that sends stock quotes using Transfer-Enconding: chunked. The chunks are much smaller than 8k. mod_proxy buffers the results of the stock ticker until the buffer recieved 8k. This delay defeats the desired push effect of the ticker. There is a

AW: mod_proxy buffering small chunks

2006-02-06 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , VIS
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Alan Gutierrez The proposed solution is to poll for chunks using non-blocking I/O. When the socket returns EAGAIN, the 8K buffer is flushed, and the socket is read with blocking I/O. Thats the way the code is already designed in 2.2.x.

RE: mod_ssl 5s delay

2006-02-06 Thread Boyle Owen
-Original Message- From: Joe Orton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Montag, 6. Februar 2006 11:35 To: Oden Eriksson Cc: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: mod_ssl 5s delay On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 05:30:17PM +0100, Oden Eriksson wrote: For some reason I get a 5 seconds delay for

RFC: 2.2 vs third-party 2.0 auth modules

2006-02-06 Thread Joe Orton
Whilst 2.2 is, as advertised, source-compatible with 2.0 auth modules, the current implementation requires that any auth configuration using such modules is changed to add AuthBasicAuthoritative off otherwise mod_auth_basic will see no provider configured - use default file provider - fails

Re: mod_ssl 5s delay

2006-02-06 Thread Oden Eriksson
söndagen den 5 februari 2006 17.30 skrev Oden Eriksson: Hello. For some reason I get a 5 seconds delay for each ssl access, I get it with 2.2.0 and 2.2.x head. I just can't figure out what is wrong. It worked fine with 2.0.x. This was because of a RTLD_DEEPBIND patch added from the fedora

Re: RFC: 2.2 vs third-party 2.0 auth modules

2006-02-06 Thread Brad Nicholes
On 2/6/2006 at 8:26:07 am, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Whilst 2.2 is, as advertised, source-compatible with 2.0 auth modules, the current implementation requires that any auth configuration using such modules is changed to add AuthBasicAuthoritative off otherwise

Re: mod_python 3.2.7 available for testing

2006-02-06 Thread Ron Reisor
+1 MacOSX 10.4.4 PPC, Apache-2.0.55-prefork, Python-2.4.2 +1 Solaris 10 Sparc, Apache-2.0.55-prefork, Python-2.4.2 cheers, Ron Ron Reisor [EMAIL PROTECTED] (RWR3) University of Delaware Information Technologies/Network and Systems Services Computing Center/192 South Chapel Street/Newark DE,

Re: svn commit: r374821 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES buildconf server/Makefile.in

2006-02-06 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Joe Orton wrote: On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 02:41:06AM -, William Rowe wrote: Author: wrowe Date: Fri Feb 3 18:41:02 2006 New Revision: 374821 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=374821view=rev Log: Solaris build proposal; don't fail on missing .h files within a VPATH build, and don't

Re: svn commit: r374908 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS

2006-02-06 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Ping jorton, you -0'ed the proposed patch below, with a suggested improvement. I have not seen your comments yet on the adjustment to address your concern, which I committed a week or two ago. What's your current vote? Opinions from anyone else? Bill --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS