Re: APXS troubles

On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 06:12:26PM +0200, Ralf Mattes wrote: Anyway - indeed there is a bug in APXS. Unless your input files have the extention '.c' APXS won't invoke libtool in compile mode (hence it's missing from your trace). Libtool in link mode will just create an empty library ... [cut]

2.2.5?

Now that the security related patches have been backported to 2.2.x is there anything that prevents us from releasing 2.2.5? Sander Temme volunteered to be the RM back in May. Is this still valid? Regards Rüdiger

Re: 2.2.5?

Ruediger Pluem wrote: Now that the security related patches have been backported to 2.2.x is there anything that prevents us from releasing 2.2.5? for me, not really I just want to finish the mod_proxy stuff related to PR37770 to get it in this release. Cheers Jean-Frederic Sander Temme

Re: svn commit: r556298 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x: CHANGES STATUS server/mpm_common.c

On 7/14/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: sctemme Date: Sat Jul 14 10:03:18 2007 New Revision: 556298 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=556298 Log: Backport of 2.0.x PID table problem fix + *) SECURITY: CVE-2007-3304 (cve.mitre.org) + scoreboard pid

Re: svn commit: r556298 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x: CHANGES STATUS server/mpm_common.c

On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 08:30:37AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote: On 7/14/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: sctemme Date: Sat Jul 14 10:03:18 2007 New Revision: 556298 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=556298 Log: Backport of 2.0.x PID table problem fix +

Introducing mod_openpgp

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear people at httpd-dev, My name is Buanzo, and I'm developing an IETF draft regarding OpenPGP Extensions to the HTTP Protocol. So far I've implemented HTTP-request signing, and an interesting session protocol (for web application's login, via a

Re: svn commit: r556298 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x: CHANGES STATUS server/mpm_common.c

On 7/19/07, Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 08:30:37AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote: On 7/14/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: sctemme Date: Sat Jul 14 10:03:18 2007 New Revision: 556298 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=556298

Re: mod_auth_ntlm_winbind needs hosting

Dmitry Butskoy wrote: There is a module, mod_auth_ntlm_winbind, which allows to authenticate users against a Windows domain using NTLM and Negotiate authentication mechanisms. The module uses a way, recommended by the Samba team -- it utilizes a special helper program ntlm_auth, which

Re: svn commit: r556298 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x: CHANGES STATUS server/mpm_common.c

On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 09:06:39AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote: On 7/19/07, Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 08:30:37AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote: assert( CVE-2007-3304 does not apply to 2.0.x. This commit is a fix in the same general area as the 2.2.x

Re: 2.2.5?

On Jul 19, 2007, at 3:22 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: Now that the security related patches have been backported to 2.2.x is there anything that prevents us from releasing 2.2.5? Sander Temme volunteered to be the RM back in May. Is this still valid? Absolutely. I was going to propose a

RE: 2.2.5?

Issue 42665 fixes a long existing bug in httpd. A patch is included with the issue. I would like to nominate it for inclusion in v2.2.5 http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42665

Re: 2.2.5?

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Allen Pulsifer Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. Juli 2007 17:11 An: dev@httpd.apache.org Betreff: RE: 2.2.5? Issue 42665 fixes a long existing bug in httpd. A patch is included with the issue. I would like to nominate it for inclusion in v2.2.5

Re: 2.2.5?

Hey Allen, On Jul 19, 2007, at 8:11 AM, Allen Pulsifer wrote: Issue 42665 fixes a long existing bug in httpd. A patch is included with the issue. I would like to nominate it for inclusion in v2.2.5 http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42665 Thank you for contributing! As

RE: 2.2.5?

Thank you for contributing! As Rüdiger already points out, we want patches to go into the development trunk Whenever someone is ready to test this patch and/or commit it to the development trunk, please feel free. I think it should be obvious that if patches are going to sit around untested

RE: 2.2.5?

Thanks for the pointer but this patch is not even contained in trunk yet and as far as I remember the patch is only an optimization (compared to a bug that makes a functionality unusable). So I would guess that it misses the boat for 2.2.5. The patch is not an optimization--it fixes a bug

Re: 2.2.5?

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Allen Pulsifer Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. Juli 2007 17:54 An: dev@httpd.apache.org Betreff: RE: 2.2.5? Thank you for contributing! As Rüdiger already points out, we want patches to go into the development trunk Whenever someone is ready

Re: APXS troubles

On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 10:41 -0400, Farokh Irani wrote: Did you get the file OK and have you had a chance to look at it?\ Yes and yes - even so it was binhexed ... I allready replied yesterday evening - no idea why you didn't get my mail. Anyway - indeed there is a bug in APXS. Unless your input

Re: svn commit: r557576 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS

On 07/19/2007 01:22 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: covener Date: Thu Jul 19 04:22:32 2007 New Revision: 557576 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=557576 Log: provide a 2.2.x alternative Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS Modified: