Re: patch for flood to deal with gcc 4

2008-04-18 Thread Oden Eriksson
Den Friday 18 April 2008 00.24.14 skrev Guy Ferraiolo: Folks Here's the patch to get this to compile correctly with gcc 4. It's actually only 3 lines. This has been tested with the following versions: gcc version 3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-8), (RHEL4 32-bit) gcc version 4.1.1 20070105

Re: trunk build broken...

2008-04-18 Thread jean-frederic clere
Ruediger Pluem wrote: Trunk should now build again. If not then you may have to clean you apr-util installation directory (remove include/apr-1/apr_ssl.h). Cheers Jean-Frederic Regards Rüdiger On 04/17/2008 07:25 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Hmmm httpd-trunk, apr-trunk and

Re: svn commit: r649239 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy: mod_proxy_ajp.c mod_proxy_http.c

2008-04-18 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Apr 17, 2008, at 4:10 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: Index: modules/proxy/mod_proxy_ajp.c === --- modules/proxy/mod_proxy_ajp.c (Revision 649232) +++ modules/proxy/mod_proxy_ajp.c (Arbeitskopie) @@ -58,18 +58,8 @@ /*

Re: svn commit: r649239 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy: mod_proxy_ajp.c mod_proxy_http.c

2008-04-18 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , VF-Group
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Jim Jagielski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Freitag, 18. April 2008 14:51 An: dev@httpd.apache.org Betreff: Re: svn commit: r649239 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy: mod_proxy_ajp.c mod_proxy_http.c On Apr 17, 2008, at 4:10 PM,

Re: svn commit: r649239 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy: mod_proxy_ajp.c mod_proxy_http.c

2008-04-18 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Apr 18, 2008, at 8:55 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote: IMHO it cannot include the query args except for the nocanon case as in all other cases r-uri was used which does not contain query args. This is different from the situation in mod_proxy_http where we can act as real (forward) proxy.

Re: AuthzMergeRules directive

2008-04-18 Thread Chris Darroch
Brad Nicholes wrote: I could go along with switching the default merging rule from OR to AND, even within a dir block. The reason why it is OR today was basically for backward compatibility. Since there really wasn't any kind of logic before, OR was just the default. If we switch to AND as

Re: patch for flood to deal with gcc 4

2008-04-18 Thread Guy Ferraiolo
I believe the other warnings are from the code prior to my patch. I was somewhat shy about altering other people's code as a newbie. The fixes would be easy, anyone could do them. I felt responsible for my new code which others might not want to mess with. Guy On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 09:24

Re: patch for flood to deal with gcc 4

2008-04-18 Thread Oden Eriksson
Den Friday 18 April 2008 17.49.29 skrev Guy Ferraiolo: I believe the other warnings are from the code prior to my patch. I was somewhat shy about altering other people's code as a newbie. The fixes would be easy, anyone could do them. I felt responsible for my new code which others might