Re: sending data to output filter

2008-06-11 Thread Nick Kew
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 23:35:42 +0200 Tamas Palagyi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If the ap_pass_brigade() returned means that all my data has been sent successfully? Yes - to the next filter in the chain (if pass_brigade returned success). Is ap_pass_brigade going to block till all data

Re: sending data to output filter

2008-06-11 Thread Tamas Palagyi
Thanks Nick, I am writing a module that have similar proxy functionality as mod_proxy_connect: proxying traffic from client nodes to internal nodes those speaking their unknown binary protocol. The difference that I use the bucket/brigades IO to be able to use the filter infrastructure. Mainly

Re: Response Time and mod_rt

2008-06-11 Thread ed
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 19:40:14 -0700 (PDT) N S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Where can I get the mod_rt module? Or can someone send it to me? Cause I want to know each request response time in my Apache access_log? Or any other way that I don't know? http://modules.apache.org/search.php Although

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP Server 2.2.9

2008-06-11 Thread Jorge Schrauwen
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 5:22 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jim Jagielski wrote: Your votes please; +/-1 [+1] Release httpd-2.2.9 as GA I'll rely on others to review linux, solaris, et al, but based on Win32 I'm very happy and just waiting for feedback from my

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP Server 2.2.9

2008-06-11 Thread Jorge Schrauwen
Ok did a new build with openssl on vs 2008 on vista. It still give me hell over ipv6... there is a patch that fixes it! https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21320action=edit with this patch it works fine following the basic steps of converting the source (lineends.pl), perl

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP Server 2.2.9

2008-06-11 Thread jean-frederic clere
Jim Jagielski wrote: Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.2.9 are available at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Your votes please; +/-1 [ ] Release httpd-2.2.9 as GA DO NOT begin distributing these in any manner whatsoever, please note that you can seriously mess up any user who

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP Server 2.2.9

2008-06-11 Thread Niklas Edmundsson
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008, Jim Jagielski wrote: Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.2.9 are available at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Your votes please; Out of curiosity, when does the voting close? /Nikke - a bit bogged down at the moment --

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP Server 2.2.9

2008-06-11 Thread Oden Eriksson
Den Wednesday 11 June 2008 02:50:50 skrev Jim Jagielski: Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.2.9 are available at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Your votes please; +/-1 [ ] Release httpd-2.2.9 as GA DO NOT begin distributing these in any manner whatsoever, please note

Re: 2.2.9 testing with OpenSSL 0.9.8h

2008-06-11 Thread Oden Eriksson
Den Wednesday 11 June 2008 02:57:13 skrev Rainer Jung: This is only an info for others who might run into the same problem: I used the httpd test suite for httpd 2.2.9 in combination with OpenSSL 0.9.8h (the recent version). The test suite calls openssl \ req -new -key

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP Server 2.2.9

2008-06-11 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Jun 11, 2008, at 6:24 AM, Niklas Edmundsson wrote: On Tue, 10 Jun 2008, Jim Jagielski wrote: Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.2.9 are available at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Your votes please; Out of curiosity, when does the voting close? I'd like to release Friday, noon

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP Server 2.2.9

2008-06-11 Thread Rainer Jung
Jim Jagielski schrieb: Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.2.9 are available at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Your votes please; +/-1 [ ] Release httpd-2.2.9 as GA +1 (non-binding) Tested on Solaris 8 Sparc with latest test framework (without -ssl). No failures, but a couple of

Re: apxs is missing -fPIC and ignores it

2008-06-11 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Sunday 2008-06-08 20:59, Sander Temme wrote: On Jun 8, 2008, at 11:47 AM, Jan Engelhardt wrote: Sometimes you miss the wood for the trees :-) But still, should not apxs's libtool add -fPIC on its own, like the normal (GNU) libtool does? It should behave like GNU libtool, because it *is*

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP Server 2.2.9

2008-06-11 Thread Brad Nicholes
On 6/10/2008 at 6:50 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.2.9 are available at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Your votes please; +/-1 [ ] Release httpd-2.2.9 as GA DO NOT begin distributing

Re: [patch] Add IPV6 'specials' flag to mod_rewrite

2008-06-11 Thread Ryan Phillips
Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 9:19 PM, Ryan Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ryan Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: So I needed to create some mod_rewrite rules only for IPv6 when httpd is configured for both ipv4 and ipv6 modes. This patch adds 'RewriteCond

[PATCH] suppress SUEXEC_BIN printfs when suexec disabled

2008-06-11 Thread David Jones
mod_info and apachectl -V both output SUEXEC info, even if suexec has been explicitly turned off with --disable-suexec. example of current apachectl -V after running with ./configure --disable-suexec: bin/apachectl -V ... Server compiled with -D APACHE_MPM_DIR=server/mpm/worker -D

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP Server 2.2.9

2008-06-11 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 06/11/2008 02:50 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.2.9 are available at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Your votes please; +/-1 [ +1 ] Release httpd-2.2.9 as GA Here are my results: Summary: Solaris 8, 9 on SPARC, 32 bit build, gcc 3.3.2, using

Virtualhost _default_:nnnn in test framework

2008-06-11 Thread Nick Kew
Line 367 in t/conf/httpd.conf reads: VirtualHost _default_:8530 This causes a failure on Solaris, with Could not resolve address '255.255.255.255' -- check resolver configuration. The same thing happens in various other places in the test suite's config. Is _default_ supposed to do anything

Re: [patch] Add IPV6 'specials' flag to mod_rewrite - try 2

2008-06-11 Thread Ryan Phillips
Ryan Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 9:19 PM, Ryan Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ryan Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: So I needed to create some mod_rewrite rules only for IPv6 when httpd is configured for both ipv4 and