Re: compile failure [WAS: '']

2009-04-20 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
macke...@animalhead.com wrote: Trying your new libapreq2-2.12, specifying the apxs path to Makefile.PL under FreeBSD 6.3, yields the following in the 'make' step: I've seen this too. I submited a patch for the freebsd ports tree pending the ports freeze ending in ~1 week we hope and the

Re: Deregister and register a single module on passing signal..

2009-04-20 Thread Eric Covener
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 11:58 PM, Jaysingh Samuel jayasingh.sam...@hotmail.com wrote: 1. If iam passing a SigUSR2 signal to the parent process, then will i be able to reload/rerun only my custom Modules,  without reading the config file ?. No, all the modules are reloaded and the config is

RE: Deregister and register a single module on passing signal..

2009-04-20 Thread Jaysingh Samuel
Eric, Thanks for your reply, let me make my question clear.. I have one Custom module, which i want to reload every 10mins, when i give graceful then it reloads all the modules and also the config directives. Because of this i want to have an option in the httpd say reloadcustom which takes

Bug report for Apache httpd-1.3 [2009/04/19]

2009-04-20 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Re: mod_proxy/mod_proxy_balancer bug

2009-04-20 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Apr 17, 2009, at 4:28 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: The same type of balancing decision algorithm was part of mod_jk between 1.2.7 and 1.2.15. I always had problems to understand, how it exactly behaves in case some workers are out of order. The algorithm is interesting, but I found it very

Re: segfaults / core dumps caused by ap_internal_fast_redirect

2009-04-20 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Apr 19, 2009, at 7:58 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: As I have seen no further proposals in the last 14 days for a replacement of ap_internal_fast_redirect (as said I have no idea either) I would like to fix the current code to avoid the segfaults that are currently occurring. My outlined

Re: segfaults / core dumps caused by ap_internal_fast_redirect

2009-04-20 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Ruediger Pluem wrote: 3. Fix the current internal consumers of ap_internal_fast_redirect (mod_dir / mod_negotiation to use the _ex versions and feed them with the request pool. If we don't clear the test-redirect pool between attempts, where does that leave us? It sounds like a memory

2.2.12 ?

2009-04-20 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
Hi, I count ~24 changes since 2.2.11 and at least 2 of which I've been asked to plop directly in freebsd ports tree. That tells me its time. I know I haven't done it before, but I might consider being the RM if everyone else is ENOTIME. Thoughts? --

Re: 2.2.12 ?

2009-04-20 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Philip M. Gollucci pgollu...@p6m7g8.comwrote: Hi, I count ~24 changes since 2.2.11 and at least 2 of which I've been asked to plop directly in freebsd ports tree. That tells me its time. I know I haven't done it before, but I might consider being the RM if

Re: SNI in 2.2.x (Re: Time for 2.2.10?)

2009-04-20 Thread Kaspar Brand
Ruediger Pluem wrote: Looks good. Some minor nitpicks: Reviewing the code again I don't think we need to have +#ifndef OPENSSL_NO_TLSEXT + !(SSL_get_servername(ssl, TLSEXT_NAMETYPE_host_name)) +#endif this condition at all. Agreed. I have removed this part from the if