On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Hi,
I count ~24 changes since 2.2.11 and at least 2 of which I've been asked to
plop directly in freebsd ports tree. That tells me its time.
I know I haven't done it before, but I might consider being the RM if
everyone else is ENOTIME.
+1
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Kaspar Brand
Gesendet: Freitag, 24. April 2009 07:15
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: SNI in 2.2.x (Re: Time for 2.2.10?)
Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
As I said further down below I see also good and valid use
cases for the
Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
Comparing against anything else but 'SUCCESS' is IMHO a flaw in the
configuration. 'GENEROUS' IMHO only says that some kind of
certificate was sent at all.
That's also my interpretation. Depending on what the exact meaning of
'GENEROUS' should be in our
Rainer Jung wrote:
On 21.04.2009 08:48, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Hi,
I count ~24 changes since 2.2.11 and at least 2 of which I've been
asked to plop directly in freebsd ports tree. That tells me its time.
I know I haven't done it before, but I might consider
