Re: [PATCH] proxy_util.c: ap_proxy_determine_connection connecting improper HTTPS backend

2014-01-24 Thread Hendrik Harms
Is it possible to merge this patch into httpd-2.4 / 2.5 ? This would solve problems if the backend is an IBMs Access Manager V6.0 or an other server not able to serve absoluteURIs Reqards, Hendrik 2013/12/16 Hendrik Harms hendrik.ha...@gmail.com If an (improper) backend server could only

[PATCH] proxy_util.c: ap_proxy_determine_connection connecting improper HTTPS backend

2013-12-16 Thread Hendrik Harms
If an (improper) backend server could only serve requests with abs_paths but not absoluteURIs (RFC 2616 5.1.2) we couldn't place this backend behind a forward proxy using https. https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55892 This patch would solve this. I've added the

[PATCH] ProxyRemote with Proxy-Authorization

2006-01-18 Thread Hendrik Harms
-- -- Hendrik Harms mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- mod_proxy.c.orig2005-09-20 20:14:29.0 +0200 +++ mod_proxy.c 2005-12-13 11:08:42.0 +0100 @@ -434,7 +434,7 @@ /* handle the scheme */ ap_log_error(APLOG_MARK

Re: Proxy-Authorization needed for ProxyRemote

2005-11-25 Thread Hendrik Harms
2005/11/1, Hendrik Harms [EMAIL PROTECTED]: proxy_http.c:966 . If this is not possible, it would be nice to have something like ProxyRemote * http://proxy-user:[EMAIL PROTECTED] to add this feature, I think it is necassary to extend the struct proxy_remote in mod_proxy.h: struct

Proxy-Authorization needed for ProxyRemote

2005-11-01 Thread Hendrik Harms
Header. So I think it would be the best to pass through the Proxy-Authorization Header. If this is not possible, it would be nice to have something like ProxyRemote * http://proxy-user:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Regards, Hendrik -- -- Hendrik Harms