Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available

2008-01-04 Thread The Doctor
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 03:00:46PM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote: Apache HTTP Server fans, The latest versions of all 3 variants of Apache HTTP Server (1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7) have been tagged. The test tarballs are available for testing and feedback at the below location. Everyone is

Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate tarballs for review

2007-09-06 Thread The Doctor
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 09:48:28AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: On Sep 4, 2007, at 5:29 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Available for your testing pleasure, 3, count 'em, 3 Apache HTTP Server release candidate tarballs, located, as expected at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ This vote

Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.5, 2.0.60 1.3.38 release candidate tarballs for review

2007-08-14 Thread The Doctor
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 07:49:54PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: Available for your testing pleasure, 3, count 'em, 3 Apache HTTP Server release candidate tarballs, located, as expected at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ This vote will run through August 14, 2007... +/-1 (x ==

Re: {Spam?} Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.5, 2.0.60 1.3.38 release candidate tarballs for review

2007-08-14 Thread The Doctor
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 03:02:31AM +0200, Guenter Knauf wrote: Hi, That is what I am finding with thi set of prereleases. One exaple http://www.nk.ca/cgi-bin/syswatch.pl And another http://ns2.nk.ca/cgi-bin/syswatch.pl it seems to me that you have not setup syswatch properly

Re: {Spam?} Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.5, 2.0.60 1.3.38 release candidate tarballs for review

2007-08-14 Thread The Doctor
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 03:02:31AM +0200, Guenter Knauf wrote: Hi, That is what I am finding with thi set of prereleases. One exaple http://www.nk.ca/cgi-bin/syswatch.pl And another http://ns2.nk.ca/cgi-bin/syswatch.pl it seems to me that you have not setup syswatch properly

Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 1.3.36 Candidate

2006-05-14 Thread The Doctor
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 09:34:38AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: Please test and vote on releasing Apache httpd 1.3.36 Download from: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Changes: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/CHANGES_1.3 MD5s: MD5 (apache_1.3.36.tar.Z) =

Re: [VOTE] 2.0.58 Candidate

2006-04-26 Thread The Doctor
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 10:20:34AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: +1: OS X 10.4.6 (gcc 4.0.1 and 3.3), Sol8/Sparc, Suse 10.0 +1 BSD/OS 4.3.1 (gcc 3.2.3) running on http://www.nk.ca On Apr 24, 2006, at 2:40 PM, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote: O.k., for the last time, hopefully :) A candidate for

Re: [VOTE] 2.2.2 Candidate

2006-04-23 Thread The Doctor
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 06:37:47PM -0600, The Doctor wrote: On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 05:21:35PM -0700, Paul Querna wrote: The Doctor wrote: REmoved -DDEBUG but now I get: httpd: Syntax error on line 241 of /var/www/conf/httpd.conf: API module structure `access_module' in file /usr

Re: [VOTE] 2.2.2 Candidate

2006-04-22 Thread The Doctor
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 11:30:46PM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote: Paul Querna wrote: Please test and vote on releasing httpd 2.2.2, bundling APR and APR-Util 1.2.7. Built as an RPM on RHEL4/i386 and built/deployed on RHEL4/x86_64. +1. Regards, Graham -- Failure on BSD/OS 4.3.1

Re: [VOTE] 2.2.2 Candidate

2006-04-22 Thread The Doctor
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 04:32:34PM -0700, Paul Querna wrote: The Doctor wrote: On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 11:30:46PM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote: Paul Querna wrote: Please test and vote on releasing httpd 2.2.2, bundling APR and APR-Util 1.2.7. Built as an RPM on RHEL4/i386 and built

Re: [VOTE] 2.2.2 Candidate

2006-04-22 Thread The Doctor
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 05:21:35PM -0700, Paul Querna wrote: The Doctor wrote: REmoved -DDEBUG but now I get: httpd: Syntax error on line 241 of /var/www/conf/httpd.conf: API module structure `access_module' in file /usr/contrib/libexec/apache/mod_access.so is garbled - perhaps

Re: Apache HTTP Server 1.3.34 prerelease tarballs

2005-10-17 Thread The Doctor
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 08:14:55AM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote: +1 NetWare Brad BSD/OS using Ben-SSL . On 10/13/2005 at 6:34:52 pm, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Look for the Apache HTTP Server 1.3.34 prerelease tarballs in:

Re: [pre-release] 2.0.55 *candidate* available for testing

2005-10-10 Thread The Doctor
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 10:11:13AM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote: +1 NetWare Brad BSD/OS using Openssl 0.9.8 is spot on! On 10/9/2005 at 10:42:43 pm, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The httpd-2.0.55 candidate, including win32 source .zip and installers*, is

Re: 2.1.0-rc1 tarballs up for testing

2004-09-02 Thread The Doctor
On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 12:53:02AM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote: Sander Striker wrote: The tarballs for 2.1.0-rc1 (tag: STRIKER_2_1_0_RC1) are now located at the usual location: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Note that the 2.1 tarball does _not_ come prepackaged with APR, you will

Re: 2.0.49 (rc3) tarballs available, WAS: Re: 2.0.49 (rc2) tarballsavailable

2004-03-17 Thread The Doctor
Flops on BSD/OS 5.X PLEASE accommodate for BSD/OS 5.X On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 03:26:30PM -0700, Brad Nicholes wrote: Looking good on NetWare Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com [EMAIL

Re: 2.0.49 (rc2) tarballs available

2004-03-14 Thread The Doctor
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 01:32:53PM +0100, Sander Striker wrote: Hi, There are 2.0.49-rc2 tarballs available at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ The differences with respect to the rc1 tarball are: - BeOS specific MPM fixes - Netware specific rand.c fixes - Documentation

Re: 2.0.49 (rc2) tarballs available

2004-03-14 Thread The Doctor
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 04:07:27PM +0100, Sander Striker wrote: On Sun, 2004-03-14 at 15:22, The Doctor wrote: On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 01:32:53PM +0100, Sander Striker wrote: Hi, There are 2.0.49-rc2 tarballs available at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist

Re: 2.0.49 (rc2) tarballs available

2004-03-14 Thread The Doctor
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 04:07:27PM +0100, Sander Striker wrote: On Sun, 2004-03-14 at 15:22, The Doctor wrote: On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 01:32:53PM +0100, Sander Striker wrote: Hi, There are 2.0.49-rc2 tarballs available at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist

Re: 2.0.49 (rc2) tarballs available

2004-03-14 Thread The Doctor
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 04:39:46PM +0100, Sander Striker wrote: On Sun, 2004-03-14 at 16:16, The Doctor wrote: On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 04:07:27PM +0100, Sander Striker wrote: On Sun, 2004-03-14 at 15:22, The Doctor wrote: Failure again on BSD/OS 5.1 Yeah, I wasn't expecting

Re: 2.0.49 (rc2) tarballs available

2004-03-14 Thread The Doctor
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 04:04:31PM +, Joe Orton wrote: On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 07:22:24AM -0700, The Doctor wrote: Failure again on BSD/OS 5.1 It seems libtool does not know how to build shared libraries on BSD/OS 5.x; try editing srclib/apr/configure and search'n'replace the places

Re: 2.0.49 (rc2) tarballs available

2004-03-14 Thread The Doctor
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 05:18:19PM -0700, The Doctor wrote: On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 04:04:31PM +, Joe Orton wrote: On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 07:22:24AM -0700, The Doctor wrote: Failure again on BSD/OS 5.1 It seems libtool does not know how to build shared libraries on BSD/OS 5.x

Re: 2.0.49 (rc1) tarballs available for testing

2004-03-12 Thread The Doctor
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 06:02:03PM +0100, Sander Striker wrote: Hi, There are 2.0.49-rc1 tarballs available for testing at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Please report your results to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks in advance, Sander Fails in BSD/OS 5.1 sh-2.02# make install

Re: 2.0.48 tarballs ready for testing

2003-10-26 Thread The Doctor
On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 03:49:44PM -0700, Brad Nicholes wrote: Looks good on NetWare. Check for BSD/OS . +1 for release (both 2.0.48 1.3.29) Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com [EMAIL

Re: Tagged 2.1

2003-09-29 Thread The Doctor
BIG -1 on BSD/OS!! Failed on mod_ruby and mod_perl . On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 10:02:29AM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote: -1 on NetWare. The latest round of atomic changes killed us. APR no longer compiles. I will be committing the NETWARE changes in apr_atomic.h soon. Brad Brad Nicholes

Re: Tagged 2.0

2003-09-29 Thread The Doctor
+1 on BSD/OS!! On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 10:19:07AM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote: -1 on NetWare. With the new call to apr_atomic_init() that was added to apr_pool.c, apr_pool.c must now #include apr_atomic.h in order to pick up the NETWARE macro for apr_atomic_init. Without it, it doesn't