On 02 Feb 2012, at 4:13 PM, Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
So my thoughts are that this concept could be generalised.
A simple answer is to add new string setting options. For example:
int SSL_CTX_set_options_string(SSL_CTX *ctx, const char *str);
This works for existing simple configuration
On 04/02/2012 07:32, Kaspar Brand wrote:
On 02.02.2012 15:13, Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
int SSL_CTX_config(SSL_CTX *ctx, const char *config_name);
Where config_name is a named configuration option in the OpenSSL
configuration
file. This has the substantial advantage that there would
then
On 02.02.2012 15:13, Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
So perhaps:
int SSL_CTX_set_config_string(SSL_CTX *ctx,
const char *name, const char *value);
Where the values of name can expand over time.
I'm more in favor of this one - i.e., allow configuration through
-Original Message-
From: Dr Stephen Henson [mailto:shen...@opensslfoundation.com]
Sent: Donnerstag, 2. Februar 2012 15:14
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: OpenSSL configuration and mod_ssl
Guys,
It has been apparent for some time that mod_ssl (and other applications)
require
On 02/02/2012 14:22, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
It has been apparent for some time that mod_ssl (and other applications)
require
a considerable effort to support new features in OpenSSL.
A third method is to delegate the configuration completely to OpenSSL
using a
separate
