Re: T of 2.4.17 this week

The T will happen today around 1:30pm eastern, which is ~1.5hrs from 'now'...

Re: T of 2.4.17 this week

Jus curious, why is e.g. LUA there ? -Original Message- From: Jim Jagielski Sent: Thursday, October 8, 2015 12:44 PM To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: ** Re: T of 2.4.17 this week Since we are not bundling them, we don't. On Oct 7, 2015, at 6:40 PM, Steffen &l

Re: T of 2.4.17 this week

Since we are not bundling them, we don't. > On Oct 7, 2015, at 6:40 PM, Steffen wrote: > > Do we need in LICENSE.txt the license of nghttp2 (MIT) ? > > Also missing there libxml2. > > On Wednesday 07/10/2015 at 15:46, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> So the plan is to T

Re: T of 2.4.17 this week

With the changes, I decided to wait a day and let things settle: Will T tomorrow when I return from keynoting at Drupal Camp Baltimore. > On Oct 7, 2015, at 9:45 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > So the plan is to T sometime tomorrow, likely > later on in the afternoon, eastern

Re: T of 2.4.17 this week

On 10/8/2015 3:57 AM, Steffen wrote: Jus curious, why is e.g. LUA there ? Probably because when mod_lua was added it got added and not the case when mod_proxy_html and mod_xml2enc got added nor did I think about it when adding mod_h2. My fault. This is beyond the scope of httpd's source

Re: T of 2.4.17 this week

Do we need in LICENSE.txt the license of nghttp2 (MIT) ? Also missing there libxml2. On Wednesday 07/10/2015 at 15:46, Jim Jagielski wrote: So the plan is to T sometime tomorrow, likely later on in the afternoon, eastern time.

Re: T of 2.4.17 this week

So the plan is to T sometime tomorrow, likely later on in the afternoon, eastern time.

Re: T of 2.4.17 this week

e to share! :) > > > > On 10/5/2015, 5:54:04 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > >> I propose a T of 2.4.17 this week with a release for next. I > >> will RM. > >> > >> Comments? > >> > >

Re: T of 2.4.17 this week

On 10/05/2015 06:35 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > +1! > There's so much new goodness we have to share! :) > > On 10/5/2015, 5:54:04 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: >> I propose a T of 2.4.17 this week with a release for next. I >> will RM. >> >

Re: T of 2.4.17 this week

On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 7:44 AM, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> wrote: > On 10/05/2015 06:35 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > > +1! > > There's so much new goodness we have to share! :) > > > > On 10/5/2015, 5:54:04 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote:

Re: T of 2.4.17 this week

On 2015-10-05 23:07, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 8:30 PM, olli hauer wrote: >> >> would you mind to look at #58126 ? >> >> It contains a simple patch for acinclude.m4 to suppress warnings about >> underquoted calls to AC_DEFUN. > > Committed in r1706918, backport

RE: T of 2.4.17 this week

Thank you, Yann! Regards, Yingqi -Original Message- From: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 05, 2015 11:38 AM To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: T of 2.4.17 this week Hi Yingqi, this was done in r1705492, will be in 2.4.17. Regards, Yann. On Mon

Re: T of 2.4.17 this week

On 2015-10-05 17:54, Jim Jagielski wrote: > I propose a T of 2.4.17 this week with a release for next. I > will RM. > > Comments? > Hi Jim, would you mind to look at #58126 ? It contains a simple patch for acinclude.m4 to suppress warnings about underquoted calls to AC_DEF

RE: T of 2.4.17 this week

Hi Jim, Can you please look and incorporate the SO_REUSEPORT patch for this release as well? Thanks, Yingqi -Original Message- From: olli hauer [mailto:oha...@gmx.de] Sent: Monday, October 05, 2015 11:30 AM To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: T of 2.4.17 this week On 2015-10-05 17

Re: T of 2.4.17 this week

i > > -Original Message- > From: olli hauer [mailto:oha...@gmx.de] > Sent: Monday, October 05, 2015 11:30 AM > To: dev@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: T of 2.4.17 this week > > On 2015-10-05 17:54, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> I propose a T of 2.4.17 this week with a

Re: T of 2.4.17 this week

On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 8:30 PM, olli hauer wrote: > > would you mind to look at #58126 ? > > It contains a simple patch for acinclude.m4 to suppress warnings about > underquoted calls to AC_DEFUN. Committed in r1706918, backport proposed in r1706923. Regards, Yann.

Re: T of 2.4.17 this week

+1! There's so much new goodness we have to share! :) On 10/5/2015, 5:54:04 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > I propose a T of 2.4.17 this week with a release for next. I > will RM. > > Comments? >

T of 2.4.17 this week

I propose a T of 2.4.17 this week with a release for next. I will RM. Comments?