Theo Schlossnagle wrote:
This is just a followup to a previous mail:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200805.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The apr-utils include mod got immediate uptake. Thanks Paul!
I didn't see much progress on the rest of it. How do I got about
guiding
On Dec 4, 2008, at 10:52 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
Theo Schlossnagle wrote:
This is just a followup to a previous mail:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200805.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The apr-utils include mod got immediate uptake. Thanks Paul!
I didn't see much progress on
Pinging the list once again,
If atleast the below goes in, it would be possible to submit patches
to increase the coverage independently of the build patches. (I would
like to add more coverage in other interesting modules too.)
| - discussion on dtrace patches by Theo seems to have
Hello,
- discussion on dtrace patches by Theo seems to have wound down
lately, with only the build steps being problematic.
Here is the least that we could do while the conf|build steps are
figured out. (so that more probes can be added in the meantime.)
1) we need
This is just a followup to a previous mail:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200805.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The apr-utils include mod got immediate uptake. Thanks Paul!
I didn't see much progress on the rest of it. How do I got about
guiding through the patch acceptance
