On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 05:42:10PM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 05:36:06PM +, Joe Orton wrote:
> > 3) in the mean time I worked up a PR for mod_dav_fs which adds a global
> > mutex around the dbm lockdb use. This passes my stress tests for the
> > first time.
>
>
On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 05:36:06PM +, Joe Orton wrote:
> 3) in the mean time I worked up a PR for mod_dav_fs which adds a global
> mutex around the dbm lockdb use. This passes my stress tests for the
> first time.
How concurent is the stress test?
In the past, I have been badly hurt by a
Adding dev@httpd to a dev@apr thread about apr_dbm locking being broken.
On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 07:43:13AM -0600, Greg Stein wrote:
> Or, apps can stick to an older APR. ... we don't have to carry this forward
> into future versions of APR (IMO).
>
> To your point, it is probably a single page
