Re: patch for spurious open attempt on .../file.html/.htaccess

2007-06-14 Thread Oden Eriksson
onsdag 13 juni 2007 skrev Allen Pulsifer: The attached patch is the final one and applies to 2.2.4? -- Regards // Oden Eriksson --- server/request.c 2006-07-12 05:38:44.0 +0200 +++ server/request.c.oden 2007-06-14 09:35:48.0 +0200 @@ -931,13 +931,21 @@ #ifdef

RE: patch for spurious open attempt on .../file.html/.htaccess

2007-06-14 Thread Allen Pulsifer
The attached patch is the final one and applies to 2.2.4? Yes, that is the final patch. It is a diff from v.2.2.4. The indentation might not be quite correct after applying that patch. Due space-to-tab conversion issues with my editor, I had to do a diff -u -b, and the patch is not correctly

RE: patch for spurious open attempt on .../file.html/.htaccess

2007-06-14 Thread Allen Pulsifer
Here's a proper diff, without the spacing issue. (It was actually a line terminator issue, caused by editing the file under Windows.) --- request.c-2.2.4 2007-06-14 06:47:44.850623600 -0400 +++ request.c 2007-06-13 21:34:01.659559100 -0400 @@ -931,12 +931,20 @@ #ifdef

patch for spurious open attempt on .../file.html/.htaccess

2007-06-13 Thread Allen Pulsifer
server/request.c lines 930 to 940 currently read: if (r-finfo.filetype #ifdef CASE_BLIND_FILESYSTEM (filename_len = canonical_len) #endif ((opts.opts (OPT_SYM_OWNER | OPT_SYM_LINKS)) == OPT_SYM_LINKS)) { thisinfo.filetype

RE: patch for spurious open attempt on .../file.html/.htaccess

2007-06-13 Thread Allen Pulsifer
if (r-finfo.filetype == APR_REG (!r-path_info || !*r-path_info) ) Possible stupid question, but why do we need this path_info check? ap_directory_walk uses r-path_info to hold the portion of the path that has not yet been walked. The check on

revised patch for spurious open attempt on .../file.html/.htaccess

2007-06-13 Thread Allen Pulsifer
After sending that last post, I realized that if the full path points to a directory, it will do a final lstat even though it doesn't need to. That's easy to fix. Here is the revised code, the revised patch, and test output. CODE: if (r-finfo.filetype #ifdef CASE_BLIND_FILESYSTEM

revised(3) patch for spurious open attempt on .../file.html/.htaccess

2007-06-13 Thread Allen Pulsifer
I hate to have to do this... I realized that ++seg should only be incremented when the optimization results in either a continue or a break. Here is the correction: CODE: if (r-finfo.filetype #ifdef CASE_BLIND_FILESYSTEM (filename_len = canonical_len) #endif