On Mon, 01 Dec 2008 02:55:15 -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: pquerna
Date: Sun Nov 30 18:55:14 2008
New Revision: 721952
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=721952view=rev
Log:
Add two new modules, originally written at Joost, to handle load balancing
across
multiple apache
Takashi Sato wrote:
On Mon, 01 Dec 2008 02:55:15 -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: pquerna
Date: Sun Nov 30 18:55:14 2008
New Revision: 721952
+
+static void *hb_worker(apr_thread_t *thd, void *data)
Don't this need to be APR_THREAD_FUNC?
Fixed in r724090.
+{
+hb_ctx_t
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
+typedef struct hb_ctx_t
+{
+int active;
+apr_sockaddr_t *mcast_addr;
+int server_limit;
+int thread_limit;
+int status;
+int keep_running;
Shouldn't this be volatile?
Changed, r723660.
+if (res == SERVER_READY
On Dec 5, 2008, at 4:21 AM, Paul Querna wrote:
Is there any reason why we must use either APR_LOCK_FCNTL or
APR_LOCK_FLOCK,
wouldn't the default mutex work?
The default lock mech on OSX is sysvsem. I couldn't get it to work
properly after forking at all.
Maybe I was doing something
Jim Jagielski schrieb:
On Dec 5, 2008, at 4:21 AM, Paul Querna wrote:
Is there any reason why we must use either APR_LOCK_FCNTL or
APR_LOCK_FLOCK,
wouldn't the default mutex work?
The default lock mech on OSX is sysvsem. I couldn't get it to work
properly after forking at all.
Maybe
On 12/01/2008 03:55 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: pquerna
Date: Sun Nov 30 18:55:14 2008
New Revision: 721952
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=721952view=rev
Log:
Add two new modules, originally written at Joost, to handle load balancing
across
multiple apache servers
