Hi Vinoth,
+1, Sounds good to me. Working in parallel can increase efficiency.
Best,
Vino
taher koitawala 于2019年8月2日周五 上午1:00写道：
> Agreed. Scope should be 1 and 2. We will take on 1 while you take on 2
>
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2019, 9:54 PM Vinay Patil wrote:
>
> > Hi Vinoth,
> >
> > Thank you for
Agreed. Scope should be 1 and 2. We will take on 1 while you take on 2
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019, 9:54 PM Vinay Patil wrote:
> Hi Vinoth,
>
> Thank you for proposing this plan, let's keep the scope to 1&2 , as part of
> v1 let's start with point 1 and you guys can tackle point 2 in parallel.
>
> Excit
Hi Vinoth,
Thank you for proposing this plan, let's keep the scope to 1&2 , as part of
v1 let's start with point 1 and you guys can tackle point 2 in parallel.
Excited to be a part of this development.
Regards,
Vinay Patil
On Thu, 1 Aug 2019, 21:49 Vinoth Chandar, wrote:
> Here are my though
Here are my thoughts..
Last time, when Flink was brought up, we dug into the use-case and realized
that having Flink/Beam support for windowing on physical/arrival time
(hoodie_commit_time) would be valuable and that's why Flink was being
proposed.
I would like to separate two aspects that I feel
