[new RFC Request] The need of Multiple event_time fields verification

2022-08-05 Thread Xinyao Tian
Greetings everyone, My name is Xinyao and I'm currently working for an Insurance company. We found that Apache Hudi is an extremely awesome utility and when it cooprates with Apache Flink it can be even more powerful. Thus, we have been using it for months and still keep benefiting from it.

Re: [new RFC Request] The need of Multiple event_time fields verification

2022-08-05 Thread Shiyan Xu
Hi Xinyao, awesome achievement! And really appreciate your keenness in contributing to Hudi. Certainly we'd love to see an RFC for this. On Fri, Aug 5, 2022 at 4:21 AM 田昕峣 (Xinyao Tian) wrote: > Greetings everyone, > > > My name is Xinyao and I'm currently working for an Insurance company. We >

Re: [new RFC Request] The need of Multiple event_time fields verification

2022-08-07 Thread Xinyao Tian
Hi Shiyan, Thanks so much for your feedback as well as your kind encouragement! It’s always our honor to contribute our effort to everyone and make Hudi much awesome :) We are now carefully preparing materials for the new RFC. Once we finished, we would strictly follow the RFC process shown

Re: [new RFC Request] The need of Multiple event_time fields verification

2022-08-09 Thread Sivabalan
Eagerly looking forward for the RFC Xinyao. Definitely see a lot of folks benefitting from this. On Sun, 7 Aug 2022 at 20:00, 田昕峣 (Xinyao Tian) wrote: > Hi Shiyan, > > > Thanks so much for your feedback as well as your kind encouragement! It’s > always our honor to contribute our effort to every

Re: [new RFC Request] The need of Multiple event_time fields verification

2022-08-09 Thread Xinyao Tian
Hi Sivabalan, Thanks for you kind words! We have been working very hard to prepare materials for the RFC this week since we got your feedback about our idea, and I promise it will be very soon (within a few days) that everyone can read our RFC and realize every details about this feature. It

Re: [new RFC Request] The need of Multiple event_time fields verification

2022-08-09 Thread Sivabalan
sure. Approved and landed! On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 at 18:55, 田昕峣 (Xinyao Tian) wrote: > Hi Sivabalan, > > > > > Thanks for you kind words! We have been working very hard to prepare > materials for the RFC this week since we got your feedback about our idea, > and I promise it will be very soon (withi

Re: [new RFC Request] The need of Multiple event_time fields verification

2022-08-09 Thread Xinyao Tian
Just saw the PR has been approved. Thanks a lot for your time! We will submit the RFC materials as soon as possible (within a few days to our best effort). Look forward to receiving your further feedback at that time. Wish you have a good day :) Xinyao On 08/10/2022 13:44,Sivabalan wrote: sure

Re: [new RFC Request] The need of Multiple event_time fields verification

2022-08-12 Thread Xinyao Tian
Hi Shiyan, Hope you are doing well. As promised, we finished writing the RFC proposal and now we are ready to submit them as a PR with confident. According to the RFC Process, in order to check our elaborated designed RFC proposal, we need to add at least two PMCs as reviewers to examine it

Re: [new RFC Request] The need of Multiple event_time fields verification

2022-08-12 Thread Xinyao Tian
Hi Sivabalan, Hope you are doing well. As promised, we finished writing the RFC proposal and now we are ready to submit them as a PR with confident. According to the RFC Process, in order to check our elaborated designed RFC proposal, we need to add at least two PMCs as reviewers to exam

Re: [new RFC Request] The need of Multiple event_time fields verification

2022-08-16 Thread Sivabalan
yes, sounds good. Appreciate that. my github profile is https://github.com/nsivabalan On Fri, 12 Aug 2022 at 01:25, 田昕峣 (Xinyao Tian) wrote: > > > > Hi Sivabalan, > > > > > Hope you are doing well. As promised, we finished writing the RFC proposal > and now we are ready to submit them as a PR w

Re: [new RFC Request] The need of Multiple event_time fields verification

2022-08-16 Thread Xinyao Tian
Appreciate for your time and effort in advance! Since we didn’t any way to invite code reviewers in the PR, thus we mentioned you in the comment. The url of our PR is:https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/6382 By the way, could you please tell us is there a better way to notice you and others in t