+1 definitely - no more question marks.
Jeff Butler
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 12:34 AM, Clinton Begin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> One thing I forgot to mention...
>
> With iB3 I don't think we should support question mark parameters at all
> anymore. So even if you specify the elements, they're
Excellent! Now I can change ibator so that it can be used to generate
queries that return 50 billion rows and suck up all your network bandwidth!
(Just kidding)
Jeff Butler
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 10:46 PM, Clinton Begin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> The coolest thing... this test passes in iBATI
besides the discussion about the structure of the xml I have one wish: Could you describe the xml with an xml
schema instead of a dtd? It's just more accurate to describe complex xmls with a schema instead of dtd.
Regards
Kai
--- Original Nachricht ---
Absender: Clinton Begin
Datum: 13.08.200
+1 for changing the silentlyFailWhenNoResultClassOrResultMapPresent behaviour, I have to admit I stumpled
across this problem for several times ;-)
--- Original Nachricht ---
Absender: Larry Meadors
Datum: 16.08.2008 07:42
Amen!
? = ambiguous
One more thing: What about a
shootFlamesOutTheBack
Amen!
? = ambiguous
One more thing: What about a
shootFlamesOutTheBackOfTheComputerWhenNoResultClassOrResultMapPresent
setting somewhere to offset the
silentlyFailWhenNoResultClassOrResultMapPresent default. ;-)
Maybe even have a default result mapping option - if all else fails,
just dump the r
One thing I forgot to mention...
With iB3 I don't think we should support question mark parameters at all
anymore. So even if you specify the elements, they're no longer
ordinal. They are looked up from the #param placeholders in the statement.
That way SQL is more readable, and even the eleme
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 4:27 PM, Clinton Begin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 3. : The thought here is to allow for specifying the
> options (e.g. javaType="") outside of the SQL statement and to avoid
> duplication if the same property is used more than once. But maybe it's too
> much for such a
The coolest thing... this test passes in iBATIS 3... no changes, it just
worked.
Clinton
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Jeff Butler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's the general idea. I'm not sure of the merits of it or not. The pro
> is that you could fill out a graph with one query. Th
Couple of notes...
* The top level call was for a list of categories (not just one).
* I adapted this test from an existing test where categories had many
products, which in turn had many items.
So that would seem to be almost all of the possible cases... combinations of
those should work, b
I just wrote a little unit test for that. It totally works. Here's the
ResultMap to make sure we're talking about the same thing
*
*
Clinton
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 10:17 PM, Larry Meador
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 4:27 PM, Clinton Begin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 4. groupBy is gone completely. The element combined with the
> ID element now work together to achieve this. I agree the old
> implementation was annoying. What do you mean by multiple independent
> lists? Does that n
3. : The thought here is to allow for specifying the
options (e.g. javaType="") outside of the SQL statement and to avoid
duplication if the same property is used more than once. But maybe it's too
much for such a rare case? But still, some people may prefer to keep the
param details out of the
Some comments:
1. Looks good!
2. Enclosing elements seems OK to me
3. +1 on killing parameter maps. I strongly dislike declared parameter maps
and think that they are constantly misused/misunderstood. I'm not clear
what the benefit of the element is - why not force inline parameters
100% of the
BTW: It's probably best to copy and paste that XML into an editor, it
doesn't read very well in an email window
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 11:50 PM, Clinton Begin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I'd like to get some feedback on the things you like and dislike about the
> current XML, a
The only thing that i would note would be that the dynamic sql should
also contain an or a .
B
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 12:50 AM, Clinton Begin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I'd like to get some feedback on the things you like and dislike about the
> current XML, and also show you so
15 matches
Mail list logo
