Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.8.0-incubating RC2

2020-04-30 Thread Samarth Jain
+1 (non-binding) all checks passed On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 4:06 PM John Zhuge wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > >1. Checked signature and checksum >2. Checked license >3. Built and ran unit tests. > > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 2:24 PM Owen O'Malley > wrote: > >> +1 >> >>1. Checked

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.8.0-incubating RC2

2020-04-30 Thread John Zhuge
+1 (non-binding) 1. Checked signature and checksum 2. Checked license 3. Built and ran unit tests. On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 2:24 PM Owen O'Malley wrote: > +1 > >1. Checked signature and checksum >2. Built and ran unit tests. >3. Checked ORC version :) > > On Monday, ORC

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.8.0-incubating RC2

2020-04-30 Thread Owen O'Malley
+1 1. Checked signature and checksum 2. Built and ran unit tests. 3. Checked ORC version :) On Monday, ORC released 1.6.3, so we should grab those fixes soon. .. Owen On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 12:34 PM Dongjoon Hyun wrote: > +1. > > 1. Verified checksum, sig, and license > 3. Build

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.8.0-incubating RC2

2020-04-30 Thread Dongjoon Hyun
+1. 1. Verified checksum, sig, and license 3. Build from the source and run UTs. 4. Run some manual ORC write/read tests with Apache Spark 2.4.6-SNAPSHOT (as of today). Thank you, all! Bests, Dongjoon. On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 10:28 AM parth brahmbhatt < brahmbhatt.pa...@gmail.com> wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.8.0-incubating RC2

2020-04-30 Thread Mass Dosage
The build for RC2 worked fine for me, I didn't get a failure on "TestHiveTableConcurrency". Perhaps there is some kind of race condition in the test? I have seen timeout errors like that when I ran tests on an overloaded machine, could that have been the case? On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 at 08:32,