+1 (non-binding) verified signature and checksum, build and test passed.
On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 6:10 PM Sam Redai wrote:
> +1 (non-binding) signature, checksum, license, build and test
>
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 12:36 AM OpenInx wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> 1. Download the source tarball, si
Any thoughts for adding StarRocks integration to the roadmap ?
I think the guys from StarRocks community can provide more background and
inputs.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 5:59 PM OpenInx wrote:
> Update:
>
> StarRocks[1] is a next-gen sub-second MPP database for full analysis
> scenarios, includin
A few additional observations about StarRocks...
- As far as I can tell, StarRocks has an ASF incompatible license (Elastic
License 2.0).
- It appears to be a hard fork of Apache Doris, a project still in the
incubator (and looks like it probably is destructive to the Doris project)
- The project
+1, I have the same concern for the incompatible license.
Jacques Nadeau 于2021年11月8日周一 上午11:48写道：
> A few additional observations about StarRocks...
>
> - As far as I can tell, StarRocks has an ASF incompatible license (Elastic
> License 2.0).
> - It appears to be a hard fork of Apache Doris, a
Hi,
I am trying to understand how to identify the schema for an Iceberg
snapshot.
Looking at the spec, I see the following:
Snapshots
A snapshot consists of the following fields:
v1v2FieldDescription
*required* *required* snapshot-id A unique long ID
*optional* *optional* parent-snapshot-id The
+1 around concerns with the Elastic license.
Also, more importantly, how important is integration with either of these
tools to the Iceberg community and contributors?
The Elastic license makes a bit more sense for elasticsearch, as it was an
existing project for quite some time. I won’t reiterat
