Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.5.0 RC6

Sorry for being late to the vote. I just noticed relative links to internal markdown files are incorrect in many places after site migration. I opened #9919 and #9920 to fix some of them. Not sure this is a blocker for 1.5.0 release. Manu On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 9:47 AM Ajantha Bhat wrote: > T

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.5.0 RC6

Forgot to add links to those PRs. https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/9919 https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/9920 On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 3:23 PM Manu Zhang wrote: > Sorry for being late to the vote. > I just noticed relative links to internal markdown files are incorrect in > many pla

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.5.0 RC6

Hi Manu, Site docs can be updated independently as it is independent of jars that we publish in maven central. Also we are finding many site docs related problems after migration to the main repo and it will take a while to identify all the issues and fix them. Thanks for the fixes on the site do

Re: New committer: Renjie Liu

Congrats Renjie! On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 7:49 AM Zheng Hu wrote: > Congrats Renjie ! > > On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 9:39 AM Ajantha Bhat > wrote: > >> Congrats Renjie. >> >> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 6:44 AM Amogh Jahagirdar >> wrote: >> >>> Congrats Renjie! Very well deserved, excited to see Rust

Re: New committer: Renjie Liu

Congratulations, Renjie! Thanks for all your contributions! On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 12:52 AM Eduard Tudenhoefner wrote: > Congrats Renjie! > > On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 7:49 AM Zheng Hu wrote: > >> Congrats Renjie ! >> >> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 9:39 AM Ajantha Bhat >> wrote: >> >>> Congrats Ren

[INFRA] Cleanup dist.apache.org

Hi folks, Just a quick reminder when doing a release: we should clean up dist.apache.org areas. The artifacts from dist.apache.org release are automatically copied on archive.apache.org. So we should have only the latest release artifacts here https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/iceberg/

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.5.0 RC6

+1 (binding) Verified all the usual things Ran full test suite Everything looking good > On Mar 8, 2024, at 11:35 PM, Szehon Ho wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > * Verified signature > * Verified checksum > * RAT check > * built JDK 11 > * Ran basic tests on Spark 3.5 > > Thanks > Szehon > > On Fr

Re: New committer: Renjie Liu

Congratulations Renjie! Best, Jack Ye On Mon, Mar 11, 2024, 8:24 AM Ryan Blue wrote: > Congratulations, Renjie! Thanks for all your contributions! > > On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 12:52 AM Eduard Tudenhoefner > wrote: > >> Congrats Renjie! >> >> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 7:49 AM Zheng Hu wrote: >> >

Re: New committer: Renjie Liu

Congratulations! On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 12:43 PM Jack Ye wrote: > Congratulations Renjie! > > Best, > Jack Ye > > On Mon, Mar 11, 2024, 8:24 AM Ryan Blue wrote: > >> Congratulations, Renjie! Thanks for all your contributions! >> >> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 12:52 AM Eduard Tudenhoefner >> wrote

Re: New committer: Renjie Liu

Congrats Renjie! Thanks, Steve Zhang > On Mar 11, 2024, at 12:18 PM, Szehon Ho wrote: > > Congratulations! > > On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 12:43 PM Jack Ye > wrote: >> Congratulations Renjie! >> >> Best, >> Jack Ye >> >> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024, 8:24 AM Ryan Blue >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Improvement on our PR flows

Hey everyone, I synced up with JB about the proposal process and wanted to see if we could make some initial progress. Based on some of the earlier discussions, we want to leverage as much of the informal process as possible, but improve discoverability and a little structure. This probably means

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Iceberg release 1.5.0

I'm pleased to announce the release of Apache Iceberg 1.5.0! Apache Iceberg is an open table format for huge analytic datasets. Iceberg delivers high query performance for tables with tens of petabytes of data, along with atomic commits, concurrent writes, and SQL-compatible table evolution. This

Re: [PROPOSAL] Improvement on our PR flows

Hi, Daniel: Thanks for this summary. I think one thing missing is that do we need a vote for the proposal to be accepted or rejected? If required, what should the voting process be? On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 9:04 AM Daniel Weeks wrote: > Hey everyone, I synced up with JB about the proposal proce

Re: [PROPOSAL] Improvement on our PR flows

Good point, Renjie I believe we've always followed the code modification vote procedure with 3 PMC votes required and no lazy consensus, but we should probably be explicit about that process. I'll update the docs to reflect that. -Dan On Mon, Mar 11, 2024, 6:23 PM Renjie Liu wrote: > Hi, Dani

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Iceberg Summit Call for Proposals

+1 for the lightning talk. Thanks Ryan and team, for starting the Iceberg summit! On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 5:06 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi Ajantha, > > We will discuss that within the Selection Committee. > I think it would be great to reserve one slot (30mn) for lightning > talks (as we