Hi dev community,
I was wondering if we could join a call next week for discussing the
multi-table transactions so we can make progress. I have shared a meeting
invite where anyone who's interested in the discussion can join. Please let
me know if this works.
Thanks,
Maninder
Sync for iceberg mul
+1 (binding)
Checked signature, checksum, and licenses.
"./gradlew build" passed with the source bundle.
Ran Flink 1.20 with SQL
On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 10:42 AM Russell Spitzer
wrote:
> Discussion was back here -
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/497qxkq3nfplwo27fh959zhsc2o7hkmy
>
> On Thu, Ma
Hey Y'all
I know there has been a lot of confusion over who is allowed to host a
meetup and what it can be called. Technically, I believe the PMC is
supposed
to be involved in anything involving the Apache Iceberg trademark but I'd
like
to pre-approve a bunch of meetups if we have consensus.
Basi
Hey everyone,
The next Iceberg Meetup Europe is coming to Berlin on July 3rd!
Please register at: https://lu.ma/pposobem
The Call for Speakers is open until June 15th. The submission link can be
found on the luma page.
Looking forward to seeing you there!
Best,
Christian
Discussion was back here -
https://lists.apache.org/thread/497qxkq3nfplwo27fh959zhsc2o7hkmy
On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 12:09 AM Ajantha Bhat wrote:
> Thanks Ebihara for pointing me to the change.
>
> We should probably capture end user related changes in the release notes
> (separate section).
> I
+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, 23 May 2025 at 06:59, Kevin Liu wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> [x] Download links are valid.
> [x] Checksums and signatures.
> [x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
> [x] No unexpected binary files
> [x] All source files have ASF headers
> [x] Can compile from source
>
> Ran `./
+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 9:20 AM Yufei Gu wrote:
> +1 (binding)
> Yufei
>
>
> On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 9:18 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non binding)
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> Le ven. 23 mai 2025 à 00:38, Prashant Singh a
>> écrit :
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>> I propose an u
+1 (binding)
Yufei
On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 9:18 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> Le ven. 23 mai 2025 à 00:38, Prashant Singh a
> écrit :
>
>> Hi All,
>> I propose an update to the Rest Spec to include the Row lineage fields.
>> As these need to be passed f
+1 (non binding)
Regards
JB
Le ven. 23 mai 2025 à 00:38, Prashant Singh a
écrit :
> Hi All,
> I propose an update to the Rest Spec to include the Row lineage fields. As
> these need to be passed from server to client for reads, as it is
> inferred during planning during server side via inherita
+1
Eduard Tudenhöfner ezt írta (időpont: 2025. máj.
23., P, 9:27):
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 1:19 AM Steven Wu wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 3:39 PM Prashant Singh
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>> I propose an update to the Rest Spec to include the Row lin
Done. Thanks Micah for improving this and everyone else for voting and
reviewing.
On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 8:09 AM Micah Kornfield
wrote:
> The vote passes with 7 Binding +1s and 4 non-binding +1s
>
> Could a committer help merge the PR please?
>
> Thanks,
> Micah
>
> On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 8:33
+1 (binding)
On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 1:19 AM Steven Wu wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 3:39 PM Prashant Singh
> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>> I propose an update to the Rest Spec to include the Row lineage fields.
>> As these need to be passed from server to client for reads, as it i
12 matches
Mail list logo
