Iceberg Community Events Calendars?

There are two Google Calendars listed on the community page of the Apache Iceberg website [1] - one for community events

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.6.0 RC0

+1 (binding) On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 10:05 AM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> wrote: > Following up, > > I think I confused myself on the original issue > https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/8756 when testing. That issue > was specific to REST implementations which use

Re: [Discussion] Apache Iceberg Community Guideline - Initial Version

> 1. modified the name from "bylaws" to "community guidelines", following the latest ASF guideline I want to make sure everyone is aware that there is a substantive difference between the meaning of "bylaw" and "guideline." Here's how the two words are defined in the Cambridge Dictionary: -

Re: Feedback Collection: Bylaws in Iceberg

+ private for PMC members who may not follow dev 1/ I encourage the folks who have already responded on the private@ thread to replay their comments here. As I noted earlier, this discussion falls outside the categories that belong on the private list. 2/ I think adopting a set of clearly

Re: Feedback Collection: Bylaws in Iceberg

Hi Ryan and Jack, The ASF's PMC Guide [1] is pretty clear on what belongs on the private list: - pre-disclosure security problems - pre-agreement discussions with third parties that require confidentiality - nominees for project committer, PMC or Foundation membership - personal

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 1.4.3 RC0

+1 (binding) On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 3:44 PM Ryan Blue wrote: > +1 (binding) > > - Ran license checks > - Validated signature and checksum > - Built and validated tests are passing; CI shows python tests are red > though :( > > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 1:49 AM Ajantha Bhat > wrote: > >> +1

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Iceberg release 0.12.0

I'm pleased to announce the release of Apache Iceberg 0.12.0! Apache Iceberg is an open table format for huge analytic datasets. Iceberg delivers high query performance for tables with tens of petabytes of data, along with atomic commits, concurrent writes, and SQL-compatible table evolution.

Re: Iceberg 0.12.0 Release Plan

Daniel Weeks wrote: > I think there might be a couple more bug fixes that we want to call out. > I'm still reviewing, but will try to add any additions tomorrow. > > Thanks, > Dan > > > > On Mon, Aug 16, 2021, 8:23 PM Carl Steinbach wrote: > >> Update: still w

Re: Iceberg 0.12.0 Release Plan

Update: still waiting for a +1 on the release notes https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/2973 - Carl On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 6:25 PM Carl Steinbach wrote: > The 0.12.0 release has been approved, but before we can announce it we > need to add the release notes. > > Please help

Re: Iceberg 0.12.0 Release Plan

The 0.12.0 release has been approved, but before we can announce it we need to add the release notes. Please help us get over this hurdle by reviewing the release notes draft here: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/2973 Thanks! - Carl On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 4:46 PM Carl Steinbach wrote

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.12.0 RC3

Thanks to everyone who participated in the vote to approve Apache Iceberg 0.12.0 RC3. The vote result is: +1: 3 (binding), 3 (non-binding) +0: 0 (binding), 0 (non-binding) -1: 0 (binding), 0 (non-binding) Therefore, the release candidate is accepted.

Re: [CWS] Re: Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.12.0 RC3

The 0.12.0 release notes are ready for review here: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/2973 - Carl On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 6:06 PM Carl Steinbach wrote: > Voting is now over. The motion to release RC3 as the Apache Iceberg 0.12.0 > release passes with the following results: > &g

Re: [CWS] Re: Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.12.0 RC3

2021 at 5:05 PM Ryan Blue wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>>- Checked signatures, checksums, and RAT >>>- Ran build and test. There were only failures in >>>org.apache.iceberg.mr.hive.TestHiveIcebergStorageHandlerWithEngine >>>that I think I hit last time >>

Re: Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.12.0 RC3

cksum >>> * dev/check-license >>> * Build >>> * Run tests (though some timeout failures, on Hive MR test..) >>> * ran with Nessie in spark 3.1 and 3.0 >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 4:21 AM Carl Steinbach wrote: >>> >>>

Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.12.0 RC3

Hi Everyone, I propose the following RC to be released as the official Apache Iceberg 0.12.0 release. The commit ID is 7ca1044655694dbbab660d02cef360ac1925f1c2 * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-0.12.0-rc3 * https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-0.12.0-rc3 *

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.12.0 RC2

. I think it looks good, but we should try >>>>> to refactor to make sure we don't have more issues like this. I think when >>>>> we update our extensions to be compatible with multiple Spark versions, we >>>>> should introduce a factory method to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.12.0 RC2

g 5, 2021 at 2:23 PM Daniel Weeks wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>> >>>>> I verified sigs/sums, license, build, and test >>>>> >>>>> -Dan >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.12.0 RC2

gt; but the NessieCatalog doesn't play nice w/ Spark3.1. I will raise a patch > ASAP to fix it. Very sorry for the inconvenience. > > Best, > Ryan > > On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 3:20 AM Carl Steinbach wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> I propose that we release RC2 as

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.12.0 RC2

8D539F >> gpg: Can't check signature: No public key >> >> And I have discovered a bug in NessieCatalog. It is unclear what is wrong >> but the NessieCatalog doesn't play nice w/ Spark3.1. I will raise a patch >> ASAP to fix it. Very sorry for the inconvenience. >> >>

[NOTES] Iceberg Community Meeting - July 21 2021

Iceberg Community Meetings are open to everyone. To receive an invitation to the next meeting, please join the iceberg-s...@googlegroups.com list. Notes from previous meetings along with a running agenda for the next meeting are available here:

[VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.12.0 RC2

Hi everyone, I propose that we release RC2 as the official Apache Iceberg 0.12.0 release. Please note that RC0 and RC1 were DOA. The commit id for RC2 is 7c2fcfd893ab71bee41242b46e894e6187340070 * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-0.12.0-rc2 *

Re: Iceberg 0.12.0 Release Plan

n Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 1:02 PM Jack Ye wrote: > >> Thanks! The PR is mostly ready and just got approved by Anton. As soon as >> it is merged we can start the branch cut. >> -Jack >> >> On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 11:39 PM Carl Steinbach >> wrote: >> >>

Re: Iceberg 0.12.0 Release Plan

m/apache/iceberg/pull/2887 >> >> -Jack >> >> On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 3:08 PM Carl Steinbach wrote: >> >>> I want to provide everyone with a quick update on the 0.12.0 release >>> process. At this point, #2906 Fix Partition field IDs in table &g

Re: Iceberg 0.12.0 Release Plan

more knowledgable about this code has cycle to take a look > at it. > > It would be great to fix it for 0.12 as it seems to block more metadata > queries than before, but for timing purpose I’m not sure if its feasible. > > Thanks > Szehon > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2021

Re: [VOTE] Adopt the v2 spec changes

+1 (binding) On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 6:43 PM Daniel Weeks wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2021, 1:36 PM Kyle Bendickson > wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >>  >> >> *Kyle Bendickson* >> Software Engineer >> Apple >> ACS Data >> One Apple Park Way, >> Cupertino, CA 95014, USA >>

Re: Iceberg 0.12.0 Release Plan

>> >>>> PS: I am unsure if new PRs will be merged apart from the list proposed >>>> on the project board - into the *0.12.0* release, and hence, proposing >>>> this. If this PR will be merged - no action is needed. pl. pardon my >>>> ignorance. >&

Re: Iceberg 0.12.0 Release Plan

vro > version used in iceberg? I do not see it in the "To-Do" section linked > above, but the older avro version has caused major problems described in > this issue and it would be nice to get in 0.12.0. > https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/1654 > > > > O

Iceberg 0.12.0 Release Plan

Hi Everyone, I volunteered to be the release manager for the 0.12.0 release. My goal is to start cutting release candidates this Friday, 7/17 at 24:00 PST. I am tracking progress on this release on the Release 0.12.0 Project Board . Note that this

[NOTES] 23 June 2021 Iceberg Community Meeting

wdhury, Ben Mears, Dan Weeks, Gustavo Torres Torres, Jack Ye, Karuppayya Rajendran, Kyle Bendickson, Parth Brahmbhatt, Russel Spitzer, Ryan Blue, Sreeram Garlapati, Szehon Ho, Wing Yew Poon, Xinbin Huang, Yan Yan, Carl Steinbach - Highlights - JDBC catalog was committed (Thanks,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.11.1 RC0

+1 (binding) + Built and tested code following instructions in README + Verified checksums - Carl On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 1:13 PM John Zhuge wrote: > 1 (non-binding) > > Checked signature, checksum, and license. > Ran build and test. > > On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 5:00 AM Peter Vary > wrote: >

Re: Adobe Blog ..

I'll do it! On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 7:46 PM Ryan Blue wrote: > Yes, we should start a page with posts like these. LinkedIn recently had a > good one, too: > https://engineering.linkedin.com/blog/2021/fastingest-low-latency-gobblin > > Anyone want to start a PR for the docs? > > On Fri, Jan 15,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.9.1 RC0

LGTM +1 (binding) On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 11:47 AM Ryan Murray wrote: > 1. Verify the signature: OK > 2. Verify the checksum: OK > 3. Untar the archive tarball: OK > 4. Run RAT checks to validate license headers: RAT checks passed > 5. Build and test the project: all unit tests passed. > > +1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Iceberg 0.8.0-incubating RC2

+1 (binding) On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 9:38 AM RD wrote: > +1 > Validated all the steps mentioned. > > -R > > On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 9:31 AM Ryan Blue > wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> Ran rat, validated checksums and signature, and ran the build. >> >> I noticed that the iceberg-spark-runtime

Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg incubator report for February 2019

ff-by: > > [X](iceberg) Ryan Blue > Comments: I wrote the first pass of the report, but after the > deadline. > [ ](iceberg) Julien Le Dem > Comments: > [ ](iceberg) Owen O'Malley > Comments: Approval from +1 on dev list. > [ ](iceberg) James Taylor > Comments: > [ ](iceberg) Carl Steinbach > Comments: > > > -- > Ryan Blue >

Re: project report

+1 On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 5:14 PM Ryan Blue wrote: > Done. Thanks for working on the first draft. > > rb > > On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 4:47 PM Owen O'Malley > wrote: > > > Go ahead and edit the wiki > > > > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/December2018 > > > > I'd suggest that we do a