[DISCUSS] adoption of format version 3

2024-07-31 Thread Jacob Marble
e? Have I missed anything? -- Jacob Marble

Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg Summit proposal

2024-02-21 Thread Jacob Marble
>> look and let us know if anything doesn't look right. Note that the web >> sites probably don't exist yet since we don't have approval to use the >> Apache Iceberg brand until this process is complete. >> >> I also want to say thanks to JB for his work on this and for teaching us >> how these events work. >> >> Ryan >> >> -- >> Ryan Blue >> > -- Jacob Marble ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ

nanosecond support - renewed effort

2024-02-02 Thread Jacob Marble
Good morning, Here at InfluxData, we've dusted off the nanosecond timestamp PR <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/9008>. Thanks to Eric Gillespie for joining our team to help on this effort! -- Jacob Marble ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg community summit

2024-01-22 Thread Jacob Marble
t; > > >>>>>>>> Le ven. 12 janv. 2024 ร  18:47, Ryan Blue a > > >>>>>>>> รฉcrit : > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Hi everyone, > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> We've been having discussions about how to put together an > Iceberg > > >>>>>>>>> conference or summit for this year and one of the first steps > is to put > > >>>>>>>>> together a selection committee that will be responsible for > choosing talks > > >>>>>>>>> and guiding the process. Once we have a selection committee, > we can put > > >>>>>>>>> together the concrete proposal for the ASF and the Iceberg PMC > to request > > >>>>>>>>> the ability to use the name Iceberg. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> If you'd like to help and be part of the selection committee, > > >>>>>>>>> please volunteer in a reply to this thread. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Since we likely can't include everyone that volunteers, I > propose > > >>>>>>>>> that the PMC should choose the final committee from the set of > people that > > >>>>>>>>> volunteer. We'll leave this open for the next week or so to > give people > > >>>>>>>>> time. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Ryan > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>>>> Ryan Blue > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>> > > >>> -- > > >>> John Zhuge > > >>> > > >> > > > > Sent from my iPhone > -- Jacob Marble ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ

Re: PR: implementation of timestamp_ns and timestamptz_ns

2023-11-08 Thread Jacob Marble
Here is the second, smaller PR, touching only the API module. https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/9008 Running tests locally triggers a few failures in modules Spark and Flink, but I'm not sure what to do about those yet. On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 10:41โ€ฏAM Jacob Marble wrote: > Pe

Re: PR: implementation of timestamp_ns and timestamptz_ns

2023-11-08 Thread Jacob Marble
the coming days. > > On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:00โ€ฏPM Jacob Marble > wrote: > > > > Good morning Iceberg Dev-ers, > > > > I've worked through most of a first-pass review in this PR. Please take > a look! > > https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/8971 > > > > -- > > Jacob Marble > > ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ > -- Jacob Marble ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ

PR: implementation of timestamp_ns and timestamptz_ns

2023-11-07 Thread Jacob Marble
Good morning Iceberg Dev-ers, I've worked through most of a first-pass review in this PR. Please take a look! https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/8971 -- Jacob Marble ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ

Re: proposal: nanosecond timestamps doc

2023-09-15 Thread Jacob Marble
Good morning, I've updated the doc to integrate Ryan's feedback. There is one outstanding question for Dongjoon Hyun. Does anyone else care to comment? On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 10:07โ€ฏAM Jacob Marble wrote: > Good morning. Please share feedback on this proposal to add nanosecond

proposal: nanosecond timestamps doc

2023-09-07 Thread Jacob Marble
idea.) -- Jacob Marble ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ

Re: two proposed spec changes

2023-08-29 Thread Jacob Marble
port code; certainly need to. https://iceberg.apache.org/spec/#default-values On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 9:52โ€ฏAM Ryan Blue wrote: > Jacob, could you model this with a derived field? Or could you require the > tags and use a "unknown" value? > > On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 11:18โ€ฏAM

Re: two proposed spec changes

2023-08-28 Thread Jacob Marble
| null | 1 09:25 | "foo" | "bar" | 1 10:25 | "foo" | "bar" | 1 have these primary keys: (09:25) (09:25,A="foo") (09:25,A="foo",B="bar") (10:25,A="foo",B="bar") InfluxDB uses these primary keys in two contexts: - deduplication in query pipelines - compaction (mitigate performance impact of query-time deduplication) -- Jacob Marble ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ

Re: two proposed spec changes

2023-08-24 Thread Jacob Marble
t think it's because they'd need to choose whether to use SQL 3-valued > boolean logic or implicit null-safe equality. > I simply meant to show that there isn't much of a standard in how primary keys are handled in big data engines. I'll work with my team to consider work-arou

Re: two proposed spec changes

2023-08-24 Thread Jacob Marble
correctly, identifier fields is quite similar > to primary key in relation database. In standard sql standard, NULL != > NULL. If optional field is allowed, then two rows (1, NULL), (1, NULL) have > exactly same value while they are not equal. The reason why float, double > canโ€™t be contained

two proposed spec changes

2023-08-23 Thread Jacob Marble
d7145bc5cf4a130de36dbb96a/format/spec.md#version-3>; is there a plan for a v3 release yet? I saw a conversation about enabling v2 by default, so I assume v3 is a ways off yet. -- Jacob Marble ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ

Slack invitation link

2023-07-17 Thread Jacob Marble
Good morning, I'm looking for an invitation to join the Apache Iceberg workspace on Slack. However, the link referenced from the Community page indicates that I need an @apache.org email address. Is this true, or can I be invited as this email address? Thanks, -- Jacob Marble ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ