Re: Ignite-1.5 Release

Cool! I closed IGNITE-1282. On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 2:03 AM, Alexey Goncharuk < alexey.goncha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Guys, > > I finalized and pushed ignite-1282 branch (binary object format) into > ignite-1.5. Even though there were no comments from the community around > the design on the lates

An updated diagram for IGFS

Guys, I have updated the file system diagram here https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/file-system (both for 1.5 and 1.4 versions). The old one was creating a misleading impression that in-memory MR is dependant on YARN, which isn't the case. In the version, both YARN and in-memory MR are sitti

Local cache for AtomicConfiguration

Hi, Igniters Does it make sense to set cacheMode = LOCAl for AtomicConfiguration. property name="atomicConfiguration"> Such configuration works fine. I'm tried to find answer on readme.io ( https://apacheignite.readme.io/v1.4/docs/atomic-types) but fo

Re: Branch deletion prohibited

On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 02:16PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: > Cos, > > I believe this is the ticket: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-10798 > > This policy does seem myopic, would be great if Ignite could get an > exemption. Thanks! I already have sent email to the board where this di

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-1978) Emplement build task to development and production version

Dmitriyff created IGNITE-1978: - Summary: Emplement build task to development and production version Key: IGNITE-1978 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1978 Project: Ignite Issue T

Re: Branch deletion prohibited

Cos, I believe this is the ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-10798 This policy does seem myopic, would be great if Ignite could get an exemption. D. On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > Raul > > is there are a ticket for this INFRA ticket? Sorry if I

Re: Branch deletion prohibited

Raul is there are a ticket for this INFRA ticket? Sorry if I missed it... I regurgitate about this no-branch-delete policy imposed by a myopic "policy" considerations. And I want to increase the pressure on board@ for this sort of things. Would appreciate the pointer if exist. Thanks! Cos On

Re: MSDN subscriptions for ASF Committers

On 16.10.2015 09:48, Raul Kripalani wrote: > According to the feedback of other fellow committers, they can take weeks > to approve it (!). When did you apply? Just found this thread ... indeed, it can take weeks or even months. At some point, the subscriptions were bulk-updated every 6 months. :)