Re: Downloads on the web site

2016-11-04 Thread Denis Magda
This might be a link that is related to the topic http://sdtimes.com/apache-foundation-board-reining-datastax/ Good case so far. — Denis > On Nov 4, 2016, at 9:00 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: > > Cos, this

Re: IGNITE-3066 Set of Redis commands that can be easily implemented via existing REST commands

2016-11-04 Thread Denis Magda
Roman, Would you mind making a pull-request? It’s not clear and easy to review using the branch you provided https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/ignite-2788 This link provides details how to achieve this

Re: Off-Heap SQL Indexes

2016-11-04 Thread Denis Magda
Sergi, Thanks, now I found the exact conditions that switch the indexes from on-heap to off-heap. But looks like you did a misprint in your conclusion saying that setOffHeapMaxMemory should be 0. > Thus from the user standpoint we can say, that if either setOffHeapMaxMemory >> = 0 or

Re: Ignite & Kubernetes

2016-11-04 Thread Denis Magda
Paulo, If you’re still interested in this contribution then you can refer to this discussion http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/New-Advanced-Task-for-Contribution-Apache-Ignite-and-Kubernetes-td11952.html

Re: Off-Heap SQL Indexes

2016-11-04 Thread Sergi Vladykin
Denis, I checked the code now as well. I actually was wrong, but your statement is wrong either. If we are talking about indexes then the exact condition when index will be off-heap is the following: either setOffHeapMaxMemory >= 0 or setMemoryMode is OFFHEAP_TIERED. But if setMemoryMode is set

Re: Downloads on the web site

2016-11-04 Thread Konstantin I Boudnik
This blog post from DataStax [1] has reminded me of the conversation we had during the incubation on how to model community web-sites and how "Planet Cassandra" is doing this. Evidently, after years of the explanations and the deliberations, DataStax had finally came to their senses and stopped

Re: IGNITE-4157 design proposal

2016-11-04 Thread Semyon Boikov
Hi Sergey, I have few comments: - when new node joins cluster all existing nodes provide current data from 'collectDiscoveryData' callback and then this data is sent in TcpDiscoveryNodeAddedMessage as 'nodeId -> nodeData' map. In case of 'typeId->typeName' mapping it is supposed that when