Re: Write access to Apache Ignite repository

2017-03-17 Thread Denis Magda
Igor, I’ve double checked and do confirm that your account was added to a special LDAP group that allows you to commit changes. Please make sure that you use a valid username/password combination. — Denis > On Mar 17, 2017, at 1:23 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > > +1 > PMC members don't hav

Re: Write access to Apache Ignite repository

2017-03-17 Thread Konstantin Boudnik
+1 PMC members don't have _any_ special privileges when it gets to the code access Cos -- Take care, Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622 Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views of an

Re: Write access to Apache Ignite repository

2017-03-17 Thread Dmitriy Setrakyan
All committers, PMC or not, should have write access to the code. On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Denis Magda wrote: > CC-ing the dev list. > > Igor, it looks strange to me. I received a notification saying that > ‘isapego’ was established. Did you setup the password? > > BTW, if to refer to t

Re: IGNITE-4536 metrics of new offheap storage

2017-03-17 Thread Dmitriy Setrakyan
Sergey, I this case, I would agree with the approach proposed by Denis, where you would return an array of values. However, I still think we should provide an overall average value for the free space as well. I also think that we need to come up with some way to provide the fragmentation score, sa

Re: Write access to Apache Ignite repository

2017-03-17 Thread Denis Magda
CC-ing the dev list. Igor, it looks strange to me. I received a notification saying that ‘isapego’ was established. Did you setup the password? BTW, if to refer to this page [1] then only PMC members have a write access to the repository: They have write access to the code repository, *Dmitri

Re: IGNITE-2741 - spring session design

2017-03-17 Thread Denis Magda
Val, Will it be possible to incorporate the fix into the nearest 2.0 release? — Denis > On Mar 17, 2017, at 11:43 AM, Rishi Yagnik wrote: > > Hi Val, > > Hope you are well, any update on web session clustering. > > Thanks, > Rishi > > On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Rishi Yagnik > wrote

Re: IGNITE-4536 metrics of new offheap storage

2017-03-17 Thread Denis Magda
Sergey, Ilya, Thanks for the clarification. We’re on the same page. Dmitriy, Sergi, Alex G., do you have any thoughts on this? — Denis > On Mar 17, 2017, at 5:33 AM, Ilya Lantukh wrote: > > Denis, Sergey, > > Changes in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4535 won't be so > global.

Re: IGNITE-2741 - spring session design

2017-03-17 Thread Rishi Yagnik
Hi Val, Hope you are well, any update on web session clustering. Thanks, Rishi On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Rishi Yagnik wrote: > Hi Val, > > Thanks looking forward for the fix.. > > Take Care, > Rishi > > > On Mar 11, 2017, at 11:31 AM, Valentin Kulichenko < > valentin.kuliche...@gmail.c

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1638: IGNITE-3487: Made _key and _val columns hidden

2017-03-17 Thread skalashnikov
GitHub user skalashnikov opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1638 IGNITE-3487: Made _key and _val columns hidden You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-3487 Alterna

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1573: IGNITE-3487 Removed _key and _val from table colu...

2017-03-17 Thread skalashnikov
Github user skalashnikov closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1573 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

Re: Unused argument in DirectMessageWriter

2017-03-17 Thread Александр Меньшиков
Valentin, thank you. Aleksey, yeah :-) 2017-03-16 15:51 GMT+03:00 ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV : > watch him, he is gonna remove all the messages he doesn't like :) > > чт, 16 мар. 2017 г. в 14:56, Valentin Kulichenko < > valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com>: > > > Hi, > > > > These classes are part of plugin fr

Re: distributed transaction of non-single coordinator

2017-03-17 Thread Sergi Vladykin
You know better, go ahead! :) Sergi 2017-03-17 16:16 GMT+03:00 ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV : > we've discovered several problems regarding your "accumulation" > approach.These are > >1. perfomance issues when transfering data from temporary cache to >permanent one. Keep in mind big deal of concure

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1637: IGNITE-3586: CPP: Made QueryArgument internal

2017-03-17 Thread isapego
GitHub user isapego opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1637 IGNITE-3586: CPP: Made QueryArgument internal You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-3586 Alternatively

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1636: IGNITE-518: unmute fixed tests.

2017-03-17 Thread AMashenkov
GitHub user AMashenkov opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1636 IGNITE-518: unmute fixed tests. Unmute tests that was fixed in IGNITE-4036 You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ig

Re: transactions classes usage

2017-03-17 Thread Alexander Fedotov
Hi, GridNearTx*Request are sent from the originating node while GridDhtTx*Request are sent from the primary node. If originating node is primary the same time, then only GridDhtTx*Request is sent. On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 4:48 PM, ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV wrote: > Hi all! We've got a group of GridDhtT

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1635: IGNITE-4002: Fixed warning/error messages during ...

2017-03-17 Thread isapego
GitHub user isapego opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1635 IGNITE-4002: Fixed warning/error messages during ODBC driver installation. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-igni

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1634: IGNITE-4834

2017-03-17 Thread devozerov
GitHub user devozerov opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1634 IGNITE-4834 You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-4834 Alternatively you can review and apply these

transactions classes usage

2017-03-17 Thread ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV
Hi all! We've got a group of GridDhtTx*Request classes, how do they relate to GridNearTx*Request classes? -- *Best Regards,* *Kuznetsov Aleksey*

Re: distributed transaction of non-single coordinator

2017-03-17 Thread ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV
we've discovered several problems regarding your "accumulation" approach.These are 1. perfomance issues when transfering data from temporary cache to permanent one. Keep in mind big deal of concurent transactions in Service commiter 2. extreme memory load when keeping temporary cache i

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1633: IGNITE-4827

2017-03-17 Thread tledkov-gridgain
GitHub user tledkov-gridgain opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1633 IGNITE-4827 You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-4827 Alternatively you can review and apply

Re: IGNITE-4536 metrics of new offheap storage

2017-03-17 Thread Ilya Lantukh
Denis, Sergey, Changes in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4535 won't be so global. I am not going to replace older mechanics, but rather re-enable and adjust them to work with PageMemory. We will still use the same distributed hash table and evict entries based on existing EvictionPol

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-4836) Yarn deployment is ignoring memory limits

2017-03-17 Thread Tomas Novak (JIRA)
Tomas Novak created IGNITE-4836: --- Summary: Yarn deployment is ignoring memory limits Key: IGNITE-4836 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4836 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-4835) Add ability to start rebalancing from management console

2017-03-17 Thread Alexandr Fedotov (JIRA)
Alexandr Fedotov created IGNITE-4835: Summary: Add ability to start rebalancing from management console Key: IGNITE-4835 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4835 Project: Ignite

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-4834) Allow execution of optional tasks in exchange worker

2017-03-17 Thread Vladimir Ozerov (JIRA)
Vladimir Ozerov created IGNITE-4834: --- Summary: Allow execution of optional tasks in exchange worker Key: IGNITE-4834 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4834 Project: Ignite I

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1632: Ignite 1.7.9 p1 Release

2017-03-17 Thread dkarachentsev
GitHub user dkarachentsev opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1632 Ignite 1.7.9 p1 Release You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-1.7.9-p1 Alternatively you can rev

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-4833) IngiteClientRejoinTest sometimes fails with enabled peer class loading

2017-03-17 Thread Dmitry Karachentsev (JIRA)
Dmitry Karachentsev created IGNITE-4833: --- Summary: IngiteClientRejoinTest sometimes fails with enabled peer class loading Key: IGNITE-4833 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4833

Re: IGNITE-4536 metrics of new offheap storage

2017-03-17 Thread Sergey Chugunov
Dmitriy, My main goal was to add a metric to estimate FreeList space fragmentation and "hist" was the first thing I came up with. Let's consider one case: we placed into a cache 4 entities 60% page size each. After that we'll have 4 pages in FreeList each with a hole of 40% of it's size. Utilizat

Re: IGNITE-4536 metrics of new offheap storage

2017-03-17 Thread Sergey Chugunov
Denis, My answers are in place. On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 9:04 PM, Denis Magda wrote: > Sergey, > > Considering that the swap tier will no longer be supported in 2.0 all the > methods that start with ‘getSwap…’ are no longer relevant and have to be > removed from metrics. For instance, the swap f

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1631: IGNITE-4795

2017-03-17 Thread SomeFire
Github user SomeFire closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1631 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e

[GitHub] ignite pull request #1631: IGNITE-4795

2017-03-17 Thread SomeFire
GitHub user SomeFire opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1631 IGNITE-4795 +licensies You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/SomeFire/ignite ignite-4795 Alternatively you can review and apply thes

Re: ignite-4823 - ready for review (SpringCache#putIfAbsent - wrong implementation)

2017-03-17 Thread Vyacheslav Daradur
Valentin, ok, thank you. 2017-03-16 18:39 GMT+03:00 Valentin Kulichenko < valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com>: > Vyacheslav, > > I will review and merge in nearest time. > > -Val > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 8:08 AM, Vyacheslav Daradur > wrote: > > > Hello everyone. > > > > Please review changes: *htt