Re: [ignite] your /dist/ artifacts - 1 BAD signature

2017-07-15 Thread Aleksey Chetaev
Guys, I removed test binaries. I hope Ilya S. can give more comments about this issue on Monday. Best Regards, Aleksey Chetaev. -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Fwd-ignite-your-dist-artifacts-1-BAD-signature-tp19732p19741.html Sent from

Re: Ignite Teamcity email notifications

2017-07-15 Thread Denis Magda
Excellent improvement for our testing and continuous intergration processes, thanks folks! On Saturday, July 15, 2017, Dmitry Pavlov wrote: > Hi Igniters, > > Thanks to Alexey Chetaev we can now setup personal email notifications from > the Teamcity about broken builds. >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 2.1.0 RC1

2017-07-15 Thread Denis Magda
-1 Because of the lgpl libraries issue. Please fix the bug and restart the vote. Denis On Saturday, July 15, 2017, Ilya Suntsov wrote: > Lgpl binaries should not to be in svn. This build will be removed. > > 15 июля 2017 г. 1:52 PM пользователь "Sergey Kozlov"

Re: Ignite Teamcity email notifications

2017-07-15 Thread Dmitry Pavlov
Hi Igniters, Thanks to Alexey Chetaev we can now setup personal email notifications from the Teamcity about broken builds. To set up notifications you can go to your profile and enable email notification for your own PR and/or master (see the page

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-5759) IgniteCache5 suite timed out probably by GridCachePartitionEvictionDuringReadThroughSelfTest.testPartitionRent

2017-07-15 Thread Dmitriy Pavlov (JIRA)
Dmitriy Pavlov created IGNITE-5759: -- Summary: IgniteCache5 suite timed out probably by GridCachePartitionEvictionDuringReadThroughSelfTest.testPartitionRent Key: IGNITE-5759 URL:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 2.1.0 RC1

2017-07-15 Thread Ilya Suntsov
Lgpl binaries should not to be in svn. This build will be removed. 15 июля 2017 г. 1:52 PM пользователь "Sergey Kozlov" написал: > Igniters > > Could someone explain why we include LGPL binary fabric [1] in the release? > Either it was a mistake or we should upload also

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 2.1.0 RC1

2017-07-15 Thread Sergey Kozlov
Igniters Could someone explain why we include LGPL binary fabric [1] in the release? Either it was a mistake or we should upload also SHA1/MD5/ASC checksums as well [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ignite/2.1.0-rc1/apache-ignite-fabric-lgpl-2.1.0-bin.zip On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 8:45

Re: [ignite] your /dist/ artifacts - 1 BAD signature

2017-07-15 Thread Sergey Kozlov
Guys I suppose it was uploaded by mistake and should be removed. Ilya could you explain the reasons of that deployment? On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > BTW, keep in mind that /dist ends up being sync'ed across a bunch of > Apache mirrors. So, the

Re: [ignite] your /dist/ artifacts - 1 BAD signature

2017-07-15 Thread Konstantin Boudnik
BTW, keep in mind that /dist ends up being sync'ed across a bunch of Apache mirrors. So, the experiments are better be kept to a less visible environment. Cos -- With regards, Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622 Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this