[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-8990) Web console: unexpected 'Unsaved changes' warning

Pavel Konstantinov created IGNITE-8990: -- Summary: Web console: unexpected 'Unsaved changes' warning Key: IGNITE-8990 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8990 Project: Ignite

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-8989) Web console: incorrect initial state of some checkboxes on Client Configuration panel

Pavel Konstantinov created IGNITE-8989: -- Summary: Web console: incorrect initial state of some checkboxes on Client Configuration panel Key: IGNITE-8989 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8989

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-8988) Web console: error in Readme.txt of generated project

Pavel Konstantinov created IGNITE-8988: -- Summary: Web console: error in Readme.txt of generated project Key: IGNITE-8988 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8988 Project: Ignite

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 2.6.0 RC1

+1 Checked build from sources and run several examples. On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 7:55 PM Dmitry Pavlov wrote: > > +1, checked RC ver. 2.6.0#20180710-sha1:669feacc as new DB for Ignite TC > helper (MTCGA.Bot). Data was sucessfully restored from 2.5, tool is > operational. > > I suggest to

Re: PR Reivew https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4300

Hi, Thanks to Stanislav L. for review. In the same time TC was not re-runned after changes and there is several suspicious failures in PR, so I've retriggered run-all. Let's wait for results and I'll check it one more time. Sincerely, Dmitriy Pavlov вт, 10 июл. 2018 г. в 20:52, kcheng.mvp : >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 2.6.0 RC1

+1, checked RC ver. 2.6.0#20180710-sha1:669feacc as new DB for Ignite TC helper (MTCGA.Bot). Data was sucessfully restored from 2.5, tool is operational. I suggest to publish link to staging in vote threads. It is very convinient as I can add to gradle only maven { url

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 2.6.0 RC1

+1 (binding) Checked: - build from sources; - artifacts' hashes; - examples. On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 5:06 PM Dmitry Pavlov wrote: > > Anton, I totally agree it is needed, but not sure I'll have free time to do > it soon. I will keep community posted. > > ср, 11 июл. 2018 г. в 17:01, Anton

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-8987) Ignite hangs during getting of atomic structure after autoactivation

Andrey Aleksandrov created IGNITE-8987: -- Summary: Ignite hangs during getting of atomic structure after autoactivation Key: IGNITE-8987 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8987

Re: Clusterwide settings validation

BTW, I have added a ticket for the configuration template [1] and linked it to the ticket originally created by Yakov [2]. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8986 [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8951 D. On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 6:58 PM, Yakov Zhdanov wrote: >

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-8986) Need to add configuration validation template on startup

Dmitriy Setrakyan created IGNITE-8986: - Summary: Need to add configuration validation template on startup Key: IGNITE-8986 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8986 Project: Ignite

Re: Potential OOM while iterating over query cursor. Review needed.

Andrey, Correct me if I am wrong, but my impression was that after the change cursor#getAll() will return only the last page of the result, not the whole collection. If public API method semantics is preserved, then no objections from my side. ср, 11 июл. 2018 г. в 15:18, Andrey Mashenkov : >

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-8985) Node segmented itself after connRecoveryTimeout

Mikhail Cherkasov created IGNITE-8985: - Summary: Node segmented itself after connRecoveryTimeout Key: IGNITE-8985 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8985 Project: Ignite

[GitHub] ignite pull request #4288: IGNITE-8905 incorrect assertion was replaced with...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4288 ---

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-8984) Ignite 2.5 - Vulnerabilities

Segu Riluvan created IGNITE-8984: Summary: Ignite 2.5 - Vulnerabilities Key: IGNITE-8984 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8984 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Bug

Re: Clusterwide settings validation

Ivan, yes. We can go with reflection through configuration and SPIs and, you are rigth, suppressed list should be manually defined. --Yakov

[GitHub] ignite pull request #4319: IGNITE-8945: Add additional checks with informati...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4319 ---

[GitHub] ignite pull request #4321: IGNITE-7366. Code review reaction

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4321 ---

[GitHub] ignite pull request #4329: IGNITE-8942

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4329 ---

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 2.6.0 RC1

Anton, I totally agree it is needed, but not sure I'll have free time to do it soon. I will keep community posted. ср, 11 июл. 2018 г. в 17:01, Anton Vinogradov : > Ilya, > > thanks for detailed explanation. > > +1 now (binding). > > Dmitry Pavlov, > > could you please accumulate discussed and

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-8983) .NET long-running suite fails in master

Alexey Goncharuk created IGNITE-8983: Summary: .NET long-running suite fails in master Key: IGNITE-8983 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8983 Project: Ignite Issue Type:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 2.6.0 RC1

Ilya, thanks for detailed explanation. +1 now (binding). Dmitry Pavlov, could you please accumulate discussed and prepare documentation about "how to release Apache Ignite step by step"? ср, 11 июл. 2018 г. в 16:57, Ilya Suntsov : > Anton, > > Module spark-2.10 and optional lib

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 2.6.0 RC1

Anton, Module spark-2.10 and optional lib ignite-spark_2.10 were removed during the work on IGNITE-8534 IGNITE-8768 : +

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 2.6.0 RC1

Ilya, Please confirm that all changes [1] expected [1] https://ci.ignite.apache.org/repository/download/ApacheIgniteReleaseJava8_IgniteRelease72CheckFileConsistency/1478134:id/results/result.log ср, 11 июл. 2018 г. в 16:23, Ilya Suntsov : > Anton, > > Please take a look at: > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 2.6.0 RC1

Anton, Please take a look at: https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=1478134=buildResultsDiv=ApacheIgniteReleaseJava8_IgniteRelease72CheckFileConsistency

[GitHub] ignite pull request #4350: IGNITE-8981: Parallel optimizations for BaggingTr...

GitHub user avplatonov opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4350 IGNITE-8981: Parallel optimizations for BaggingTrainer add Learning environment with Logger and Parallelism strategy while learning You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-8982) SQL TX: reuse H2 connections

Ivan Pavlukhin created IGNITE-8982: -- Summary: SQL TX: reuse H2 connections Key: IGNITE-8982 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8982 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-8981) [ML] Parallel optimizations for BaggingTrainer

Yury Babak created IGNITE-8981: -- Summary: [ML] Parallel optimizations for BaggingTrainer Key: IGNITE-8981 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8981 Project: Ignite Issue Type:

[GitHub] ignite pull request #4349: IGNITE-8922 Fix delivery of pending messages

GitHub user dmekhanikov opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4349 IGNITE-8922 Fix delivery of pending messages You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-8922

Re: Potential OOM while iterating over query cursor. Review needed.

Alexey, I saw no issues on TC with this change, and change affect only private API. If you think it can break smth, then we can mark keepAll flag as deprecated to be deleted in 3.0 and change default value to true. I doubt this flag is useful for Ignite internals, and moreover user always can

[GitHub] ignite pull request #4038: IGNITE-8526 Create web-agent docker image for k8s...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4038 ---

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 2.6.0 RC1

Automation possible, but it's hard to determine previous version automatically (especially when you have 2.x and 3.x releasing concurrently) for API check [1], but RC check [1] can be chained. [1]

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 2.6.0 RC1

No, I just wondering if it could be in chain. If manual run is requires I guess we could document it somewhere, so everyone in community will be aware what should be done. ср, 11 июл. 2018 г. в 14:41, Petr Ivanov : > Currently, I have no knowledge about this build types and theirs purpose. > > I

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 2.6.0 RC1

Currently, I have no knowledge about this build types and theirs purpose. I guess release engineer has to run them manually with ignite-2.6 branch or with 2.6.0-rc1 build result. Should I do it? > On 11 Jul 2018, at 14:36, Dmitry Pavlov wrote: > > I thought these steps are to be run

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 2.6.0 RC1

I thought these steps are to be run automatically within chain and no manual steps are required. Petr, please step in. ср, 11 июл. 2018 г. в 14:30, Anton Vinogradov : > I do NOT see that API was checked [1] and automated check [2] performed > > [1] > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 2.6.0 RC1

I do NOT see that API was checked [1] and automated check [2] performed [1] https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewType.html?buildTypeId=ApacheIgniteReleaseJava8_IgniteRelease72CheckFileConsistency=buildTypeHistoryList_ApacheIgniteReleaseJava8=__all_branches__ [2]

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 2.6.0 RC1

+1 (binding) Download sources: OK Build from sources: OK Run ignite.bat: OK -- Alexey Kuznetsov

[GitHub] ignite pull request #4348: Top fut change check

GitHub user sergey-chugunov-1985 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4348 Top fut change check You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite top_fut_change_check Alternatively

Re: Subscription

Hi Ivan, it seems you've already subscribed. To subscribe it is sufficient to send emal to dev-subscr...@ignite.apache.org https://ignite.apache.org/community/resources.html#mail-lists Sincerely, Dmitriy Pavlov ср, 11 июл. 2018 г. в 4:20, Павлухин Иван : > Hi, > > Please subscribe me. > > --

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-8980) Web console: regression on Queries screen

Pavel Konstantinov created IGNITE-8980: -- Summary: Web console: regression on Queries screen Key: IGNITE-8980 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8980 Project: Ignite Issue

Re: Potential OOM while iterating over query cursor. Review needed.

Folks, Bumping up the discussion as it is hitting one of the Ignite users. The change seams reasonable to me, but it is a breaking change and may affect existing users. Would the community be ok if we change the QueryCursor#getAll method for scan queries? If not, we should expose the keepAll()

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 2.6.0 RC1

+1 Checked src archive signature, verified build from source, started a node with and without persistence. ср, 11 июл. 2018 г. в 11:24, Dmitriy Setrakyan : > Got it. I did not see the section up top. No more questions. > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 11:21 AM, Ilya Suntsov > wrote: > > > Dmitry, >

[GitHub] ignite pull request #2728: ignite-5960 Race in innerUpdate fixed

Github user voipp closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/2728 ---

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 2.6.0 RC1

Got it. I did not see the section up top. No more questions. On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 11:21 AM, Ilya Suntsov wrote: > Dmitry, > > I see 2.6 changes above 2.5: > > Apache Ignite Release Notes > > === > > Apache Ignite In-Memory Data Fabric 2.6 > >

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-8979) Web console: Unable to choose the item by the mouse in 'Refresh rate' dropdown in the Query

Pavel Konstantinov created IGNITE-8979: -- Summary: Web console: Unable to choose the item by the mouse in 'Refresh rate' dropdown in the Query Key: IGNITE-8979 URL:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 2.6.0 RC1

Dmitry, I see 2.6 changes above 2.5: Apache Ignite Release Notes > === > Apache Ignite In-Memory Data Fabric 2.6 > --- > Ignite: > * Fixed incorrect calculation of client affinity assignment with baseline. > * Fixed incorrect

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 2.6.0 RC1

Andrey, this is the link I have: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ignite.git;a=blob_plain;f=RELEASE_NOTES.txt;hb=refs/tags/2.6.0-rc1 This list does not look short. It looks like a copy of 2.5. D. On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 5:48 AM, Andrey Gura wrote: > Sorry, > > You could check it