Re: Google Guava in Ignite 3

Also, what impact will this have on peer class loading? Something I think shading also resolves On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 7:05 PM Courtney Robinson wrote: > Can I suggest shading Guava? > Guava and Netty are two notorious libraries for version conflicts because > of their popularity and

Re: Google Guava in Ignite 3

Can I suggest shading Guava? Guava and Netty are two notorious libraries for version conflicts because of their popularity and usefulness. Other projects (ES for example solved it by shading them it https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/2091#issuecomment-7156766). We use Ignite entirely

Re: Google Guava in Ignite 3

alexpolovtcev please clarify what do you mean under : «possibility of using Guava in Ignite 3», using how  necessary dependency of calcite or using like «using in our code» ? If using in code, i -1 here. thanks.     >Hello, dear Igniters! > >I would like to discuss the possibility of using

Re: Google Guava in Ignite 3

>> A user might want to use one more version. Am I wrong, but user is supposed to use thin client in ignite 3? So why we should care about guava since, frankly, it is not needed in thin client and we can make it not dependent on guava at all? чт, 5 авг. 2021 г. в 18:18, Alexander Polovtcev :

Re: Google Guava in Ignite 3

Thanks for the feedback, Andrey. Let me address your arguments: > Original Bytecode module depends on 26.0-jre Calcite depends on 29.0-jre We maybe will use some other version. A user might want to use one more version. This problem exists regardless of the fact that we allow using Guava in

Re[2]: Google Guava in Ignite 3

Andrey, seems we can use [1] it help us with point 1 in your comment, isn`t it ?   [1]  https://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-optional-and-excludes-dependencies.html   >-1 >It is sad to say -1, as Guava has very useful stuff and it looks easier to >add it as a dependency

Re: Google Guava in Ignite 3

Hi, Andrey! But what should we do with Calcite then? It already brings Guava to the project. Should we considered exclusion of the main and only query engine from the Ignite-3.0? -- Regards, Konstantin Orlov > On 5 Aug 2021, at 17:23, Andrey Mashenkov wrote: > > -1 > It is sad to say

Re: Google Guava in Ignite 3

-1 It is sad to say -1, as Guava has very useful stuff and it looks easier to add it as a dependency rather than copy-paste a code. My concerns are: 1. Original Bytecode module depends on 26.0-jre Calcite depends on 29.0-jre We maybe will use some other version. A user might want to use one more

Re: Google Guava in Ignite 3

+1, I considered it a necessary evil -- Regards, Konstantin Orlov > On 5 Aug 2021, at 16:37, Alexei Scherbakov > wrote: > > +1 > > чт, 5 авг. 2021 г. в 16:12, Alexander Polovtcev : > >> Hello, dear Igniters! >> >> I would like to discuss the possibility of using Guava >>

Re: Google Guava in Ignite 3

+1 чт, 5 авг. 2021 г. в 16:12, Alexander Polovtcev : > Hello, dear Igniters! > > I would like to discuss the possibility of using Guava > in Ignite 3. I know about the > restrictive > policy of using it in Ignite 2, but I have the following reasons: > > 1. We

Google Guava in Ignite 3

Hello, dear Igniters! I would like to discuss the possibility of using Guava in Ignite 3. I know about the restrictive policy of using it in Ignite 2, but I have the following reasons: 1. We are de-facto using it already as an implicit dependency, since the