Re: [DISCUSSION] Reserve partitions for CacheQueries

2021-12-08 Thread Pavel Tupitsyn
Agree with Ivan regarding compatibility. Partition reservation should be opt-in if we decide to proceed. > is there a real need/benefit from using > scan queries over primitive SQL queries today SQL requires additional configuration (QueryEntity) and involves memory and CPU overhead to maintain

Re: [DISCUSSION] Reserve partitions for CacheQueries

2021-12-08 Thread Ivan Pavlukhin
Hi Maksim, Thank you for looking into this. While fixing wrong/surprising behavior is very important, I also have some concerns, let's say, from different angle of view: 1. From a first glance it seems that similar behavior of scan and SQL queries is a good idea. But is there a real need/benefit

[DISCUSSION] Reserve partitions for CacheQueries

2021-12-08 Thread Maksim Timonin
Hi, Igniters! There is a known issue that ScanQuery on unstable topology returns incorrect results: duplicates data [1] or fails with an exception [2]. The reason is ScanQuery doesn't reserve partitions. IndexQuery shares the same query processing as ScanQuery, and then it is also affected by

Re: Apache Ignite 2.12 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]

2021-12-08 Thread Nikolay Izhikov
Hello. Let’s include [1] in 2.12 scope. After migrations authentication processor to security API we have an issue. Persistent data region should exists on client node if authentication is enabled. It seems very annoying for the users. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15969 >