Re: Travis service is not working properly

2022-02-02 Thread Anton Vinogradov
Asked the INFRA [1] [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-22827 On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 5:29 PM Anton Vinogradov wrote: > Igniters, > > Seems the Travis service is not working properly. > For example, it never checked my PR [1], any ideas why? > > Who knows how to fix it? > > [1]

Travis service is not working properly

2022-02-02 Thread Anton Vinogradov
Igniters, Seems the Travis service is not working properly. For example, it never checked my PR [1], any ideas why? Who knows how to fix it? [1] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/9661

Re[2]: java 17 support

2022-02-02 Thread Zhenya Stanilovsky
Petr, how can you explain the lifecycle of product ? It managed by community. I`m +1 for moving forward.   >  >>  >>>Adding ability to compile Ignite 2 with JDK11+ will require so much >>>refactoring and, sometimes, rethinking of approaches, that it will become >>>different project in some

Re: java 17 support

2022-02-02 Thread Petr Ivanov
Adding ability to compile Ignite 2 with JDK11+ will require so much refactoring and, sometimes, rethinking of approaches, that it will become different project in some ways. And there is such different project — Ignite 3. I do no think that Ignite 2 will continue its lifecycle indefinitely and

Re: java 17 support

2022-02-02 Thread Nikolay Izhikov
> will definitely not be moved to JDK more than 8th. I think is a matter to discuss :) Why we should stay on JDK8 forever? > 2 февр. 2022 г., в 15:23, Petr Ivanov написал(а): > > Hi, Davide! > > > Ignite 3 will support at least 11th JDK but that can be changed (for the > better) on

Re: java 17 support

2022-02-02 Thread Petr Ivanov
Hi, Davide! Ignite 3 will support at least 11th JDK but that can be changed (for the better) on initial release. Ignite 2 is subject to discuss, it currently runs on 11th and there should be a patch that added JDK 17 runtime support, but codebase (compile) will definitely not be moved to JDK