Re: [DISCUSSION] Customers Migraton from Thick to Thin Clients

2022-07-12 Thread Ivan Daschinsky
I am strongly against serialization, it simply doesn't work except some trivial cases. Explicit is better than implicit. вт, 12 июл. 2022 г., 12:56 Ivan Daschinsky : > Unfortunately, affinity function is not rivially constructible, at least > default one > > вт, 12 июл. 2022 г., 10:37 Pavel

Re: [DISCUSSION] Customers Migraton from Thick to Thin Clients

2022-07-12 Thread Ivan Daschinsky
Unfortunately, affinity function is not rivially constructible, at least default one вт, 12 июл. 2022 г., 10:37 Pavel Tupitsyn : > Alex, the second option is exactly what I've proposed above. > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 9:46 AM Alex Plehanov > wrote: > > > Folks, why should we construct a fully

Re: [DISCUSSION] Customers Migraton from Thick to Thin Clients

2022-07-12 Thread Pavel Tupitsyn
Alex, the second option is exactly what I've proposed above. On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 9:46 AM Alex Plehanov wrote: > Folks, why should we construct a fully functional affinity function on the > client side by custom client code? We need only a key to partition mapping, > so only this simple

Re: [DISCUSSION] Customers Migraton from Thick to Thin Clients

2022-07-12 Thread Alex Plehanov
Folks, why should we construct a fully functional affinity function on the client side by custom client code? We need only a key to partition mapping, so only this simple mapper factory will be enough. >From my point of view there are to options possible: - provide ability to set partition to key