Thin client class loader configuration

2022-10-12 Thread Łukasz Dywicki
Hello, By reviewing a backlog items related to Ignite I found that in one case we've ran into a classloading problem visible with thin client calling a compute task. It seems that currently there is no way for give a thin client classloader which should be used by it to resolve received

Ignite support for IoC beyond spring framework

2022-10-12 Thread Łukasz Dywicki
Hello, I would like to bring a proposal for Ignite to include support for @SpringResource without spring at all. We currently use ignite without Spring Framework and, to make things harder, under OSGi. As a part of exercise couple weeks ago I implemented support for IoC [1] in environment we

Re: Question

2022-10-12 Thread Ilya Kasnacheev
Hello! Questions about Ignite usage should be asked on userlist (user@) or on Stack Overflow. Regards, -- Ilya Kasnacheev ср, 12 окт. 2022 г. в 14:59, Wadhe, Amit Pralhad : > Hi Team, > > Want to understand what could be possible scenarios where below exception > can arise? > > Exception

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Ignite 2.14.0 Released

2022-10-12 Thread Pavel Tupitsyn
A small post about .NET changes: https://ptupitsyn.github.io/Whats-New-In-Ignite-Net-2.14/ Cheers! On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 10:56 AM Taras Ledkov wrote: > The Apache Ignite Community is pleased to announce the release of > Apache Ignite 2.14.0. > > Apache Ignite® is an in-memory computing

Question

2022-10-12 Thread Wadhe, Amit Pralhad
Hi Team, Want to understand what could be possible scenarios where below exception can arise? Exception while consuming the event: Failed to map SQL query to topology on data node [dataNodeId=36538e74-7ab8-4598-80f4-d7131bde18d2, msg=Data node has left the grid during query execution

Re: [DISCUSSION] IEP-91 Transaction protocol

2022-10-12 Thread Alexei Scherbakov
Hi Roman, good catch. These methods should be in Transaction, I've fixed that. вт, 11 окт. 2022 г. в 13:12, Roman Puchkovskiy : > Hi Alexei. > > Great proposal, thank you for your efforts. > > One thing that I noted is that the proposed IgniteInstructions > interface contains parameterless