ed web session clustering with WebLogic.
> > > > > >> * Hadoop: fixed a bug causing exception during MR planning when
> > > input
> > > > > split
> > > > > >> file doesn't exist.
> > > > > >> * IGFS: Added configuration flag to disable default path modes
> > under
> > > > > >> "/ignite" folder.
> > > > > >> * IGFS: Added pluggable factory interface for Hadoop FileSystem
> > > > > creation.
> > > > > >> * IGFS: Fixed file properties when running over secondary file
> > > system.
> > > > > >> * IGFS: Fixed issues with Kerberized HDFS.
> > > > > >> * IGFS: Massive performance and stability fixes.
> > > > > >> * Improved marshaller behavior during cluster topology change.
> > > > > >> * Mesos integration: added possibility to load Ignite package
> from
> > > > file
> > > > > >> system.
> > > > > >> * Optimized cache 'get' operations on affinity node.
> > > > > >> * Optimized memory usage on server nodes to allow more client
> > > > > connections.
> > > > > >> * Passed update notifier flag to discovery data to be sure that
> > all
> > > > > cluster
> > > > > >> nodes have the same notifier status as the first node.
> > > > > >> * Performance optimization for transactions that do not acquire
> > > locks.
> > > > > >> * ScanQueries over local partitions performance optimisation.
> > > > > >> * Support of package-private implementations for Ignite
> Services.
> > > > > >> * Supported Ignite Compute tasks cancellation for Ignite.NET.
> > > > > >> * Visor CMD: Added ability to attach custom scripts to alerts.
> > > > > >> * Web sessions: minor fix to prevent NullPointerException in
> some
> > > > > special
> > > > > >> case.
> > > > > >> * Web sessions: user session classes are no longer needed on
> > server
> > > > > nodes.
> > > > > >> * A lot of stability and fault-tolerance fixes.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Complete list of closed issues:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20IGNITE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.6%20AND%20status%20%3D%20closed
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> DEVNOTES
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ignite.git;a=blob_plain;f=DEVNOTES.txt;hb=refs/tags/1.6.0-rc1
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> RELEASENOTES
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ignite.git;a=blob_plain;f=RELEASE_NOTES.txt;hb=refs/tags/1.6.0-rc1
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Please start voting.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> +1 - to accept Apache Ignite 1.6.0-rc1
> > > > > >> 0 - don't care either way
> > > > > >> -1 - DO NOT accept Apache Ignite 1.6.0-rc1 (explain why)
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> This vote will go for 72 hours.
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
--
Gianfranco Murador
Igniter and Software Engineer.
Hello Dmitry,
I can do this comparison , as I am doing integration with drools
getting ideas from what is done with Infinispan.
Regards, Gianfranco
We definitely should do a comparison to Infinispan. Anyone in the community
is interested in picking this up and updating the website?
D.
On Th
Hi Dmitriy,
I'm planning to write some article about about the modules for C++ and
C#.I'm finishing the design for integration with drools that I hope to be
finished by this summer, the module will also be documented in the blog .
The blog is here: http://quite-nice-coding.blogspot.it/
Regards,
NOTES.txt;hb=refs/tags/1.5.0.final-rc3
> >
> > RELEASENOTES
> >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ignite.git;a=blob_plain;f=RELEASE_NOTES.txt;hb=refs/tags/1.5.0.final-rc3
> >
> > Please start voting.
> >
> > +1 - to accept Apache Ignite 1.5.0.final-rc3
> > 0 - don't care either way
> > -1 - DO NOT accept Apache Ignite 1.5.0.final-rc3 (explain why)
> >
> > This vote will go for 72 hours.
> >
>
--
Gianfranco Murador
Igniter and Software Engineer.
r.
Regards, Gianfranco
2015-11-28 6:30 GMT+01:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan :
> Gianfranco,
>
> I just found this repository for Drools integration:
> https://github.com/apacheignite/drools-ignite
>
> It looks a bit abandoned. Do you have plans to pick it back up?
>
> Thanks,
> D
name´s José Renato Pequeno.
> I work in biggest e-commerce of South America with IT Specialist with
> focus in Big Data, working with Hadoop and its ecosystem.
> I´d like to contribute with the Ignite team!
> Best Regards.
> José Renato Pequeno
>
--
Gianfranco Murador
Igniter and Software Engineer.
Hi Artem, I have no write permission to merge the fix
On Oct 30, 2015 11:43 AM, "Artem Shutak" wrote:
> Hi Raul,
>
> Oh, I was sure I deleted these files.
>
> Fixed in my PR: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/188. Raul,
> Gianfranco, please, review and merge the fix.
>
> Thanks,
> -- Artem --
terms that one person can serve as
> > an
> > Apache Ignite Chair.
> >
> > Each term, however is exactly one year.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Adopt the Apache Ingite Chair rotation policy
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -1 Do not adopt the proposed policy (please provide a reason)
> >
> > This VOTE will be held open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Cos
> >
>
--
Gianfranco Murador
Igniter and Software Engineer.
> > Let's agree on the final name of our .Net product. For now it is
> > > > referenced
> > > > > in various places as "Apache Ignite .Net", "Apache Ignite for
> .Net",
> > > > > "Apache Ignite .Net platform", etc..
> > > > >
> > > > > Ports of other Java projects to .Net are usually named as
> > > > "[Product].NET".
> > > > > E.g. Akka.NET, Spring.NET.
> > > > >
> > > > > I suggest use the same scheme and pick the name "Apache
> Ignite.NET".
> > > > >
> > > > > Any ideas or objections?
> > > > >
> > > > > Vladimir.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
>
--
Gianfranco Murador
Igniter and Software Engineer.
Github user murador closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/110
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user murador opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/129
IGNITE-708: Remove refreshPartitions on ResendTimeoutObject.
IGNITE-708: From what I could see, the refresh partition in case of
timeout is redundant, since each node has a refresh partition which
Github user murador closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/86
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
It works, thank you.
2015-09-30 18:14 GMT+02:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan :
> Gianfranco, please try again. I had to change some settings on the repo.
>
> D.
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Gianfranco Murador
> wrote:
>
> > Dmitriy,
> > I get this error *
hanks
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Gianfranco Murador >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Some ticket seem resolved , but the state has been left "open" . I like
> &
t;drools-ignite" repository is created. Let me now if
> you have troubles accessing it.
>
> D.
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Gianfranco Murador
> wrote:
>
> > My github username is murador.
> > Thank you.
> >
> > 2015-09-30 10:39 GMT+02:00 D
My github username is murador.
Thank you.
2015-09-30 10:39 GMT+02:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan :
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Gianfranco Murador
> wrote:
>
> > Hello Igniters ,
> > I take the discussion to understand if I have the proper approval from
> the
> &g
urs.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I thought you meant "un-assign" not "reassign". Do we know if there are
> > any
> > > critical tickets that Sergey was working on?
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > >
> > > > --Yakov
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
--
Gianfranco Murador
Igniter and Software Engineer.
Murador
Igniter and Software Engineer.
knows better than you that Ignite is more advanced than
Infinspan ?
2015-09-29 16:52 GMT+02:00 Yakov Zhdanov :
> Igniters,
>
> Given we somehow agreed on most of the scope, can everyone please cleanup
> JIRA queues accordingly?
>
> --Yakov
>
--
Gianfranco Murador
Dmitry,
Could you give me some feedback about this proposal? You think it might be
interesting? Thank you.
2015-09-29 12:00 GMT+02:00 Gianfranco Murador :
> Dmitry,
> The short answer is because JBPM is integrated well with Infinispan,the
> longest and technically correct answer is a
t; Lets use this and modify our tests. I will push the code by tomorrow EOD.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Chandresh Pancholi
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Gianfranco Murador <
> > murador.gianfra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Chandresh,
>
n Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 6:56 PM, Gianfranco Murador
> wrote:
>
> > I would like to propose the integration with JBPM ,
> > I think I can finish in a couple of weeks since I have a bit of time to
> > devote to Ignite.
> > Let me know if you agree.
> > Regards,
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1526
> > [7] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1345
> > [8] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1079
> > [9] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-961
> >
> > --Yakov
> >
>
--
Gianfranco Murador
Igniter and Software Engineer.
This news needs a tweet !! :)
2015-09-28 15:24 GMT+02:00 Yakov Zhdanov :
> subj
>
> --Yakov
>
--
Gianfranco Murador
Igniter and Software Engineer.
GitHub user murador opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/110
IGNITE-429: Implement IgniteStormStreamer to stream data from Apache Storm
The test was successful with the latest changes, we use a simulated
topology. The operation of the stream is different
Github user murador closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/109
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user murador opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/109
Ignite 429: Implement IgniteStormStreamer to stream data from Apache Storm
The test was successful with the latest changes, we use a simulated
topology. The operation of the stream is different
Github user murador closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/107
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
> >> I have checked the code. It looks good.
> > >> Just one little change make it 20 sec.
> > >>
> > >> /* Topology will run for 10sec */
> > >> Utils.sleep(2);
> > >
> > > Hm... Can someone explain what is this sle
GitHub user murador opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/107
IGNITE-429: Implement IgniteStormStreamer to stream data from Apache Storm
The test was successful with the latest changes . The operation of the
stream is different compared to the one described
Chandresh, we're ready to do a pull request. Look here:
https://github.com/murador/ignite/tree/IGNITE-429/modules/storm
2015-09-27 8:49 GMT+02:00 chandresh pancholi :
> Here is the log file.
>
> Thanks
>
> On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 10:40 PM, Gianfranco Murador <
> mu
parameter).
can you send the log file?
Regards, Gianfranco
2015-09-26 17:13 GMT+02:00 chandresh pancholi <
chandreshpancholi...@gmail.com>:
> Gian,
> Its still giving "Ouch! Argument cannot be null: streamer"
>
> On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 7:24 PM, Gianfranco Murador &
Chan,
I've fixed some issue, please take a look here:
https://github.com/murador/ignite/blob/IGNITE-429/modules/storm/src/test/java/org/apache/ignite/stream/storm/StormIgniteStreamerSelfTest.java
2015-09-26 8:29 GMT+02:00 chandresh pancholi :
> Gian,
>
> I have followed instruc
+1
2015-09-25 17:26 GMT+02:00 Sergi Vladykin :
> +1
>
> Sergi
>
> 2015-09-25 16:52 GMT+03:00 Alexey Kuznetsov :
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 8:48 PM, Anton Vinogradov wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Denis Magda
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> >
Chandresh,
I will launch the unit test later this week , if the problem persists. I
think that you should instantiate Ignite through the start() method of
Ignition class
and retrieve the Ignite cache specifying a name for the default cache. You
should provide a name also for data streamer, not pass
It ' a nice feature to be included in the grid compute module , in my
opinion . But I have a question : what difference we have with ComputeTask
class in behavioral terms ?
https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/compute-tasks
2015-09-23 16:45 GMT+02:00 Lalit Kumar Jha :
> Summarizing this:
>
> *Go
Please take look here..
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Streamers+Implementation+Guidelines
2015-09-21 14:54 GMT+02:00 chandresh pancholi <
chandreshpancholi...@gmail.com>:
> Hi Gian/Vishal/Lalit,
>
> You guys have worked on Streamer integration with Ignite. I am working on
> S
Hy Raul, it could be a valid extension of the Service Grid of Ignite ( if I
understand the point), imho.
2015-09-20 14:37 GMT+02:00 Raul Kripalani :
> Hey Igniters,
>
> Lalit Kumar Jha expressed interest [1] in contributing to ticket IGNITE-815
> [2] which aims to bring in Reactive Streams to Ign
Hi chandresh,
What are you trying to achieve? It seems you have not set an appropriate
dependencies in your project .What version of log4j are you using?
Regards, Gianfranco
2015-09-15 12:54 GMT+02:00 chandresh pancholi <
chandreshpancholi...@gmail.com>:
> Hi Igniters,
>
> I am facing this issue
GitHub user murador opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/86
IGNITE-708 remove refreshPartitions on ResendTimeoutObject
The ticket is IGNITE-708 - remove refreshPartitions on ResendTimeoutObject.
From what I could see, the refresh partition in case of
artition
> topology matters. Younger nodes should send local updates to the oldest.
> The oldest one should spread partitions after some delay buffering possible
> updates or similar messages from other nodes.
>
> Hope this helps!
> On Sep 1, 2015 11:14, "Gianfranco Murador
fely removed :)
> > > >
> > >
> > > Alexey, I actually think that this ticket is named wrongly. After
> looking
> > > at the description, it seems that Yakov is suggesting that we do not
> send
> > > the exchange message if there are no changes to
Hi Vladimir,
I think it is better to use public APIs for creating plugis, imho
Regards, Gianfranco.
2015-08-28 13:55 GMT+02:00 Vladimir Ozerov :
> Igniters,
>
> We have several types of APIs:
> 1) Public - intended for Ignite users. E.g.: IgniteCache.
> 2) Private - used only by Ignite develope
Hi Igniters,
I 'm starting to implement this patch:
Can you tell me if there is already a convenient method to see if the local
cache was updated last time interval ?
Regards, Gianfranco
--
Gianfranco Murador
Igniter and Software Engineer.
Hello to all,
I have a question about the new module: It will be possible to implement
a cluster entirely made up of nodes in .net or C ++?
Without the need for a JVM?
Thank you, Regards, Gianfranco
--
Gianfranco Murador
Igniter and Software Engineer.
45 matches
Mail list logo