Hi Alexey,
I already reviewed it, but wanted to see the resolution of IGNITE-6454
first before I merge.
Thanks,
Vladisav
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 12:39 PM, Alexey Goncharuk <
alexey.goncha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Vladislav,
>
> Can you please finalize the review? I would
Hi Tim,
thank you for delving deeper into the problem,
I left you a comment/question on the JIRA.
Best regards,
Vladisav
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 3:00 PM, Vladisav Jelisavcic <vladis...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> thanks for the update! I left you a comment on Jira.
&
Hi Tim,
thanks for the update! I left you a comment on Jira.
Best regards,
Vladisav
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 6:17 PM, Tim Onyschak <tonysc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey Vladisav,
>
> I implemented your requests. Take a look, specifically, i created an
> interface to encapsula
Hi Tim,
I reviewed your contribution and left you some comments on the pr.
Thanks!
Vladisav
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 10:14 PM, Vladisav Jelisavcic <vladis...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> thank you for the contribution!
> I'll do the review soon and let you know.
>
>
Hi Artem,
I agree, it is not supported in many frameworks;
on the other hand, Spark MLlib supports it [1].
I think it is good thing to check with users if there is a need for this,
since we are already on the topic of model importing/exporting.
Best regards,
Vladisav
[1] https
Hi Yury,
since we're already on topic for importing/exporting models,
just as a thought: maybe we should add support for PMML [1] [2]?
Best regards,
Vladisav
[1] http://dmg.org/pmml/v4-1/GeneralStructure.html
[2] https://github.com/jpmml/jpmml-model
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Yury Babak
Hi,
excellent job so far!
What about classification algorithms?
If everyone agrees, let's start by adding logistic regression to the list:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5059
Best regards,
Vladisav
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 10:00 PM, Nikita Ivanov <nivano...@gmail.com>
Vladisav Jelisavcic created IGNITE-5059:
---
Summary: Implement logistic regression
Key: IGNITE-5059
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5059
Project: Ignite
Issue Type
iteTests_IgniteDataStrucutures#
> testNameId-979977708202725050
> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1977
>
> Thanks!
>
> 14.04.2017 15:27, Dmitry Karachentsev пишет:
>
> Vladislav,
>
> Yep, you're right. I'll fix it.
>
> Thanks!
>
> 14.04.2017 15:18, Vla
wLog.html?buildId=544238;
> tab=buildResultsDiv=IgniteTests_IgniteBinaryObjectsDataStrucut
> ures
>
> Thanks!
>
> -Dmitry.
>
> 13.04.2017 16:15, Dmitry Karachentsev пишет:
>
> Thanks a lot!
>
> 12.04.2017 16:35, Vladisav Jelisavcic пишет:
>
> Hi Dmit
Hi Dmitry,
sure, I made a fix, take a look at the PR and the comments in the ticket.
Best regards,
Vladisav
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 3:00 PM, Dmitry Karachentsev <
dkarachent...@gridgain.com> wrote:
> Hi Vladislav,
>
> Thanks for your contribution! But it seems doesn't fix
GitHub user vladisav opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1780
IGNITE-4173
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/vladisav/ignite ignite-4173
Alternatively you can review and apply
GitHub user vladisav opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1751
IGNITE-1977 Fixes IgniteSemaphore failover deadlock/fail bug
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/vladisav/ignite ignite-1977
Hey Dmitry,
sorry for the late reply, I'll try to bake a pr later during the day.
Best regards,
Vladisav
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Dmitry Karachentsev <
dkarachent...@gridgain.com> wrote:
> Hi Vladislav,
>
> I see you're developing [1] for a while, did you have an
Hi everyone,
I agree with Val, he's got a point; recreating the lock doesn't seem
possible
(at least not the with the transactional cache lock/semaphore we have).
Is this re-create behavior really needed?
Best regards,
Vladisav
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 8:34 PM, Valentin Kulichenko
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Anton Vinogradov
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 3:43 AM, Roman Shtykh
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > -Roman
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tuesday, December 6, 2016 8:14 AM,
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 6:15 PM, Denis Magda wrote:
> +1
>
> —
> Denis
>
> > On Nov 16, 2016, at 2:08 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn
> wrote:
> >
> > Following the discussion on Upsource [1],
> > I would like to call a vote on accepting it as our
Hi Sergey,
thanks for finding and submitting this bug!
Best regards,
Vladisav
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Sergey Chugunov <sergey.chugu...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hello Vladisav,
>
> Thanks for confirmation!
>
> I created a JIRA <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse
nodes,
this really is a bug.
Thanks!
Vladisav
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Sergey Chugunov <sergey.chugu...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hello Vladisav,
>
> I found this behavior in a very simple environment: I had two nodes on my
> local machine started by *ExampleNodeStartup* clas
.
If this is not the case (test was executed normally) then please submit a
ticket describing more your setup,
how many nodes, how many backups configured, etc..
Thanks!
Vladisav
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Sergey Chugunov <sergey.chugu...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> I
(this is similar to:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3386).
This should be fixed (semaphore should be recreated when create==true, as
suggested by Denis in the ticket).
It should be a minor fix, will be ready for 1.8.
Best regards,
Vladisav
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Andrey Gura
Sure, I'll do the review.
It is lazy initialized, same as latch and other datastructures.
Regards,
Vladisav
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <yzhda...@apache.org> wrote:
> Vladislav, can you please review and merge to master the fix and test case
> suggested by Kro
,
Vladisav
Not working for me also,
but only 1.6.0 (latest) and 1.5.0.final, the rest is working fine.
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 8:02 AM, Sergey Kozlov wrote:
> Hi
>
> It's a known issue: apache site puts links to a nearest site for user (I
> suppose it based on IP address) and does it
Hi,
it looks really interesting to me,
I'll be glad to pick this one.
Best regards,
Vladisav
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 7:41 AM, Thomas Weise <t...@apache.org> wrote:
> Dear Ignite community,
>
> Apache Apex is a data in-motion processing platform. It was developed since
>
Github user vladisav closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/519
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Yakov,
did you had time to do another review round of ignite-642?
Thanks!
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Vladisav Jelisavcic <vladis...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Yakov,
>
> I've finished the initialization tests for ignite-642 (and moved
> serialization test from GridCac
Yakov,
I've finished the initialization tests for ignite-642 (and moved
serialization test from GridCacheLockAbstractTest to
IgniteLockAbstractSelfTest).
Please check the commit and let me know if you spot anything else.
Thanks!
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 10:11 AM, Vladisav Jelisavcic <vla
Yakov,
I reviewed the changes in ignite-642 and it looks good to me, but I have
one question.
Can you please look at my comment in ignite-642 ticket?
Thanks!
Vladisav
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 7:51 PM, Vladisav Jelisavcic <vladis...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Sure, I'll look into it la
Sure, I'll look into it later today, or tomorrow at the latest
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 5:53 PM, Yakov Zhdanov wrote:
> Vlad, please see my changes in ignite-642 and comment in the ticket.
>
> Alex, can you please take a look at my latest commit as well and provide
>
Yakov,
sorry for the long delay, I added another commit to the PR,
can you please do the review again?
Thanks!
Vladisav
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Vladisav Jelisavcic <vladis...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Yakov, I've seen your comments, can you please check the jira again?
>
>
&
Yakov, I've seen your comments, can you please check the jira again?
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Yakov Zhdanov <yzhda...@apache.org> wrote:
> Vlad, can you please check my comments again?
>
> --Yakov
>
> 2016-03-18 17:57 GMT+03:00 Vladisav Jelisavcic <vladis...@gm
Hi Yakov,
yes, thanks for the comments, I think everything should be ok now,
please review the PR and tell me if you think anything else is needed.
Once ignite-642 is merged into master,
I'll submit a PR for IgniteReadWriteLock (hopefully on time for 1.6.
release).
Best regrads,
Vladisav
Vladisav Jelisavcic created IGNITE-2768:
---
Summary: Public API for data structures should be guarded from
being invoked after node is stopped
Key: IGNITE-2768
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse
This sounds excellent, I'll get right to it.
Best regards,
Vladisav
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 2:48 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Vladislav,
>
> This would be a great contribution. For a feature like this, I would pick 1
> ML library and propose the
Igniters,
is IGNITE-1251 still a thing?
If so, I would really like to start working on this one.
Best regards,
Vladisav
Sure, no problem.
I created a ticket:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2735
and a PR to resolve this problem.
I think this should also fix: IGNITE-1977
but the non-failover test scenario is not good anymore;
Best regards,
Vladisav
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Vladimir
GitHub user vladisav opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/525
IGNITE-2735: Fixes distributed semaphore local node stopping issue.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/vladisav/ignite ignite
Vladisav Jelisavcic created IGNITE-2735:
---
Summary: Interrupt all acquires on local node after ignite.close
Key: IGNITE-2735
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2735
Project: Ignite
Vladisav Jelisavcic created IGNITE-2399:
---
Summary: Add asynchronous acquire to IgniteSemaphore
Key: IGNITE-2399
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2399
Project: Ignite
Andrey Kornev <andrewkor...@hotmail.com>
> > Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2016 10:27 AM
> > Subject: RE: Semaphore action
> > To: <dev@ignite.apache.org>
> >
> >
> >Vladisav,
> >
> > It would be great if you c
with TOP_CHANGE_THEAD_CNT = 1
everything is running ok;
@Yakov
I made a new commit to my IGNITE-638 branch,
can you please take a look?
Best regards,
Vladisav
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@gridgain.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Vladislav,
> &
v 3, 2015 at 5:46 AM, Vladisav Jelisavcic <vladis...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Dear Dmitriy,
> >
> > it sounds excellent, I would like to do it,
> > but I would like to implement ReentrantLock first:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-642
>
Dear Dmitriy,
it sounds excellent, I would like to do it,
but I would like to implement ReentrantLock first:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-642
What do you think?
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 3:37 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan
wrote:
> Igniters,
>
> MultiMap should be
GitHub user vladisav reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/120
IGNITE-638: Implements cache distributed semaphore
This interface provides a rich API for working with distributed semaphore.
Distributed semaphore provides functionality similar
Github user vladisav closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/120
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Hi everyone,
my name is VJ, i would like to implement IgniteSemaphore datastructure (
IGNITE-638).
My Jira ID is vladisav, can someone please assign it to me?
Thanks,
VJ
47 matches
Mail list logo