Created tickets for the migration:
- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15370
- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15371
-Val
On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 7:23 AM Pavel Tupitsyn wrote:
> +1, as long as 100% of the rules are checked automatically.
>
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 4:00
+1, as long as 100% of the rules are checked automatically.
On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 4:00 PM Andrey Gura wrote:
> Looks good to me. But Idea configuration for style check is not
> enough. It helps developers but does not automate style checking.
>
> Checkstyle project provides ready to use config
Looks good to me. But Idea configuration for style check is not
enough. It helps developers but does not automate style checking.
Checkstyle project provides ready to use config based on Google Code
Style [1]. I hope it matches well with Idea config and we'll avoid any
confusing incidents.
Let's
+1
пт, 20 авг. 2021 г. в 10:54, Alexander Polovtcev :
> Hi, Val. This is an extremely welcome change, thank you!
>
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 12:17 AM Valentin Kulichenko <
> valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Igniters,
> >
> > I would like to discuss a potential change to the coding guid
Hi, Val. This is an extremely welcome change, thank you!
On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 12:17 AM Valentin Kulichenko <
valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Igniters,
>
> I would like to discuss a potential change to the coding guidelines for
> Ignite 3. Currently, we're using the existing guidelines
Igniters,
I would like to discuss a potential change to the coding guidelines for
Ignite 3. Currently, we're using the existing guidelines inherited from
Ignite 2, which are described here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Coding+Guidelines
Current guidelines, however, exist for
