Re: [DISCUSSION] Documentation of thin clients (python, php, nodejs)

2021-04-26 Thread Igor Sapego
Hi, Ivan, I like your suggestion. To me it looks better than the current approach. Best Regards, Igor On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 11:47 AM Nikita Safonov wrote: > Hi Ivan, > > Thanks for sharing the information. > I'll look through the docs and share my thoughts and suggestions soon. > > Regards,

Re: [DISCUSSION] Documentation of thin clients (python, php, nodejs)

2021-04-26 Thread Nikita Safonov
Hi Ivan, Thanks for sharing the information. I'll look through the docs and share my thoughts and suggestions soon. Regards, Nikita пт, 23 апр. 2021 г. в 14:06, Ivan Daschinsky : > Hi, Nikita! Thanks for support. > > As developers of thin client, we also would try to update > documentation as

Re: [DISCUSSION] Documentation of thin clients (python, php, nodejs)

2021-04-23 Thread Ivan Daschinsky
Hi, Nikita! Thanks for support. As developers of thin client, we also would try to update documentation as soon as possible. For example, recently I've merged to master expiry policy support for python thin client and documentation was updated simultaneously [2][3] I am planning to update documen

Re: [DISCUSSION] Documentation of thin clients (python, php, nodejs)

2021-04-23 Thread Никита Сафонов
Hi Ivan, Thank you for the suggestion. I agree that Ignite main docs on thin clients probably need a clean-up to be kept up-to-date. And migrating the key information to readthedocs.io is really an option. Let's see what other Igniters think about this idea. I'd be glad if Igor Gusev could shar

[DISCUSSION] Documentation of thin clients (python, php, nodejs)

2021-04-22 Thread Ivan Daschinsky
Igniters, there are some questions regarding the documentation state of thin clients. Recently, we have released pyignite 0.4.0. Traditionally, documentation for python thin client is autogenerated from source and contains in the same git repository, as the client itself. Documentation is autogene