Re: [DISCUSSION] ignite-extension - ignite-spring-boot-autoconfigurer release.

2020-02-07 Thread Saikat Maitra
Hi Denis, As discussed with Alexey I have captured the discussion details in confluence wiki page. I have not received any concerns or follow up questions on the release process. I can certainly pause and continue to work on current migration of existing modules if more time required for the revie

Re: [DISCUSSION] ignite-extension - ignite-spring-boot-autoconfigurer release.

2020-02-07 Thread Ivan Pavlukhin
Some more thoughts. I think we can try out a first release and decide if everything is ok along the way. I suppose that we should run tests with supported Ignite versions (perhaps not all) and provide results. And finally there will be a release vote. Best regards, Ivan Pavlukhin пт, 7 февр. 202

Re: [DISCUSSION] ignite-extension - ignite-spring-boot-autoconfigurer release.

2020-02-07 Thread Denis Magda
Folks, have we agreed on the release process? Saikat, could you point all of us to a related discussion. If my memory doesn't fail me Alex Goncharuk also wanted to step in before we do the first release. - Denis On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 8:02 AM Saikat Maitra wrote: > Hi Nikolay, Ivan, Denis > >

Re: [DISCUSSION] ignite-extension - ignite-spring-boot-autoconfigurer release.

2020-02-07 Thread Saikat Maitra
Hi Nikolay, Ivan, Denis I think we can release for spring boot autoconfigure module. I will also go ahead and make release for flink ext. I have pending PR for flume and zeromq, if I can get review and approval I can go ahead and merge and release these modules as well. Regards Saikat On Fri,

Re: [DISCUSSION] ignite-extension - ignite-spring-boot-autoconfigurer release.

2020-02-07 Thread Nikolay Izhikov
Thanks for clarification. Igniters, I will proceed with the release in the next few days if there is no objections on it. > 7 февр. 2020 г., в 10:57, Ivan Pavlukhin написал(а): > > Hi Nikolay, > > In fact I did not mean anything supernatural. A scheme you mentioned >> I thought we just releas

Re: [DISCUSSION] ignite-extension - ignite-spring-boot-autoconfigurer release.

2020-02-06 Thread Ivan Pavlukhin
Hi Nikolay, In fact I did not mean anything supernatural. A scheme you mentioned > I thought we just release module with the 1.0.0 version and specify supported > Ignite version somewhere in the documentation. sounds fine to me. Best regards, Ivan Pavlukhin чт, 6 февр. 2020 г. в 15:00, Nikolay

Re: [DISCUSSION] ignite-extension - ignite-spring-boot-autoconfigurer release.

2020-02-06 Thread Nikolay Izhikov
Hello, Ivan. > As usual we need to decide about versioning and a correspondence to Ignite > versions > As we are going to have a separate release cycle I can imagine an independent > versioning scheme with a range of supported Ignite versions. Please, clarify, what do you mean? Do you have any

Re: [DISCUSSION] ignite-extension - ignite-spring-boot-autoconfigurer release.

2020-02-06 Thread Ivan Pavlukhin
Nikolay, Thank you for driving it! It is great to establish this process in practice earlier because it seems that we need to release a Flink integration soon because Ignite 2.8 is going to be released without that integration bundled. As usual we need to decide about versioning and a corresponde

Re: [DISCUSSION] ignite-extension - ignite-spring-boot-autoconfigurer release.

2020-02-05 Thread Denis Magda
Alex, did you have a chance to review Saikat’s changes related to the extensions repository organization and release approach? Denis On Wednesday, February 5, 2020, Nikolay Izhikov wrote: > Hello, Igniters. > > We don't have a release process for newly created ignite-extensions > modules. > I w

[DISCUSSION] ignite-extension - ignite-spring-boot-autoconfigurer release.

2020-02-05 Thread Nikolay Izhikov
Hello, Igniters. We don't have a release process for newly created ignite-extensions modules. I want to release two modules: * ignite-spring-boot-autoconfigure * ignite-client-spring-boot-autoconfigure Let's discuss it. Any objections to it? What should be done before release?