Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 2.2.0 RC1

Vladimir, Thanks for looking into this. The workaround blows out my mind :) Anyway, would you mind documenting? You’ll be able to explain it better than me. — Denis > On Sep 14, 2017, at 1:05 AM, Vladimir Ozerov wrote: > > Denis, > > As far as DML, I debugged the problem. Currently we wrap

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 2.2.0 RC1

Igniters... at this point this is becoming almost amusing to watch. All we aimed to do is fix one issue with memory consumption, then bunch of community members started pouring in other fixes into this "emergency" release, and as a result, nothing works. I propose to go back to the original goal -

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 2.2.0 RC1

Denis, As far as DML, I debugged the problem. Currently we wrap key fields in a wrapper type. This is done for two reasons: 1) This is absolutely must for composite primary keys 2) To avoid clashes with other tables, should we decide to support CREATE TABLE on existing caches. E.g., without it if

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 2.2.0 RC1

Unfortunately, in addition to the minor concern below I’ve stumbled on showstoppers. 1) SQL doesn’t work in Web Console: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6374 2) Some issue with CREATE TABLE’s affinityKey command or DML being use:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 2.2.0 RC1

Guys, Another point of concern. After building the binaries from sources and starting a node from a terminal ./ignite.sh ../examples/config/example-ignite.xml the node automatically turns off the QUIET mode and the terminal window is swamped by all the sort of noisy INFO logs. The same is not

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 2.2.0 RC1

Officially cancelling the vote according to found issues. On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 8:19 AM, Denis Magda wrote: > How could we miss these binaries? Isn't the release procedure automated > ODBC installers creation? I thought a smoke-testing is done for a final > release deliverable. > > Restarting

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 2.2.0 RC1

How could we miss these binaries? Isn't the release procedure automated ODBC installers creation? I thought a smoke-testing is done for a final release deliverable. Restarting the vote I guess? -- Denis On Tuesday, September 12, 2017, Igor Sapego wrote: > Wait, there is no platforms\cpp\bin di

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 2.2.0 RC1

Wait, there is no platforms\cpp\bin directory with odbc installers in binary release. Can someone double-check? Best Regards, Igor On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 7:44 PM, Igor Sapego wrote: > +1 > > Checked: > - Building of x86 and amd64 versions of C++ binaries. > - Building of x86 and amd64 version

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 2.2.0 RC1

+1 Checked: - Building of x86 and amd64 versions of C++ binaries. - Building of x86 and amd64 versions of ODBC. - C++ examples. Best Regards, Igor On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 6:16 PM, Andrey Gura wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 6:09 PM, Kozlov Maxim > wrote: > > +1 > > > >> 12 сент. 2017

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 2.2.0 RC1

+1 On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 6:09 PM, Kozlov Maxim wrote: > +1 > >> 12 сент. 2017 г., в 17:36, Sergey Kozlov написал(а): >> >> +1 >> >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Vladimir Ozerov >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Pavel Tupitsyn >>> wrote: >>>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 2.2.0 RC1

+1 > 12 сент. 2017 г., в 17:36, Sergey Kozlov написал(а): > > +1 > > > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Vladimir Ozerov > wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Pavel Tupitsyn >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> Checked: >>> - Build from sources (Java, .NET)

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 2.2.0 RC1

+1 On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Vladimir Ozerov wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Pavel Tupitsyn > wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Checked: > > - Build from sources (Java, .NET) > > - Examples (.NET) > > > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Ilya Suntsov > > wr

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 2.2.0 RC1

+1 (binding) On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Pavel Tupitsyn wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Checked: > - Build from sources (Java, .NET) > - Examples (.NET) > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Ilya Suntsov > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Checked: > > > >- Build from sources > >- Build examples (

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 2.2.0 RC1

+1 (binding) Checked: - Build from sources (Java, .NET) - Examples (.NET) On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Ilya Suntsov wrote: > +1 > > Checked: > >- Build from sources >- Build examples (ML profile enabled) >- Checked md5, sha512 and signs > > > 2017-09-12 4:11 GMT+03:00 Denis Mag

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 2.2.0 RC1

+1 Checked: - Build from sources - Build examples (ML profile enabled) - Checked md5, sha512 and signs 2017-09-12 4:11 GMT+03:00 Denis Magda : > +1 (binding) > > Built from sources and confirmed that ML profile is recovered and its > examples are running. > > — > Denis > > > On Sep 11

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 2.2.0 RC1

+1 (binding) Built from sources and confirmed that ML profile is recovered and its examples are running. — Denis > On Sep 11, 2017, at 6:31 AM, Anton Vinogradov wrote: > > Igniters, > > We have uploaded a 2.2.0 release candidate to > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ignite/2.2.0-rc1/ >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 2.2.0 RC1

+1 2017-09-11 16:31 GMT+03:00 Anton Vinogradov : > Igniters, > > We have uploaded a 2.2.0 release candidate to > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ignite/2.2.0-rc1/ > > Git tag name is > 2.2.0-rc1 > > This release includes the following changes: > > Ignite: > * Checkpointing algorithm optimi

[VOTE] Apache Ignite 2.2.0 RC1

Igniters, We have uploaded a 2.2.0 release candidate to https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ignite/2.2.0-rc1/ Git tag name is 2.2.0-rc1 This release includes the following changes: Ignite: * Checkpointing algorithm optimized * Default max memory size changed from 80% to 20% Ignite CPP: * No