The changes are ready for review
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/8733
On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 7:23 PM Igor Sapego wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I agree with your concerns about backward compatibility, but
> I think this can be a good feature that will help us to add support
> for compact footer to th
Guys,
I agree with your concerns about backward compatibility, but
I think this can be a good feature that will help us to add support
for compact footer to thin clients that do not support it currently.
Best Regards,
Igor
On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 11:49 AM Pavel Tupitsyn wrote:
> Alex,
>
> This
Alex,
This is a very good point, thank you for the heads up.
The proposal does not include changing any existing behavior,
we simply add an operation to the protocol, so there is
no compatibility risk from the server-side changes alone.
However, it looks like only .NET thin client can make use
o
Hello Pavel,
Changing the "compact footer" property for an existing database can lead to
compatibility issues. Some clients (at least java) have "false" as the
default value of the "compact footer" property, but the default value for
the server-side is "true". If thin client will receive binary co
Igniters,
Please review the IEP [1] and let me know your thoughts.
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-66%3A+Thin+Client+Automatic+Binary+Configuration
