Hi, Maxim!
I think it's ok to cherry-pick this ticket to 2.11 branch
On 2021/06/18 16:16:45, Maxim Muzafarov wrote:
> Folks,
>
> The CLI management machinery [1] for snapshots restore procedure
> merged to the master branch.
> Can we cherry-pick it to the release branch?
>
> [1] https://issue
Folks,
The CLI management machinery [1] for snapshots restore procedure
merged to the master branch.
Can we cherry-pick it to the release branch?
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14723
On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 at 12:51, Alexey Gidaspov wrote:
>
> Hi, Nikita!
>
> I think it's ok to in
Hi, Nikita!
I think it's ok to include this ticket to the 2.11. Can you cherry-pick it to
ignite-2.11 branch?
On 2021/06/11 15:44:17, Nikita Amelchev wrote:
> Hello Folks,
>
> Can we include new client connector SSL metrics [1] to the 2.11?
>
> The issue was merged to the master branch.
>
>
Hello Folks,
Can we include new client connector SSL metrics [1] to the 2.11?
The issue was merged to the master branch.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14658
чт, 10 июн. 2021 г. в 15:49, Dmitry Pavlov :
>
> Folks (from GG),
>
> could you please update tracked branch in the TC
Folks (from GG),
could you please update tracked branch in the TC Bot config file
'branches.json'. AFAIR, restart is not needed (TC bot periodically checks for
config updates automatically)
We need to setup 2.11 runs (we migth do that instead of 2.10).
More or less config should look like tha
Hi, Dmitry
I think it's fine. We should take the ticket to the scope.
On 2021/06/08 13:46:01, Dmitry Pavlov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> To my opinion it's fine, since we freezed release scope, but haven't freezed
> the code yet.
>
> So, we're at Phase2 - Rampdown phase -
> https://cwiki.apache.org/con
Hi,
To my opinion it's fine, since we freezed release scope, but haven't freezed
the code yet.
So, we're at Phase2 - Rampdown phase -
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Release+Process
Code freeze is planned to 14 June, see also
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNI
Hi ! I found that very important issue [1] (already in master) is not planned
to be in 2.11, may be it still possible to take it into scope ?
thanks !
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14739
>Hi Folks,
>
>Branch divergence has been completed. Sorry for the delay, it was my f
