> On Jan 31, 2017, at 4:24 PM, Alexey Kuznetsov wrote:
>
> Denis,
>
>>> I would make it transparent for the user giving ability to work with
> LOCAL queries as well. How difficult is to support this?
> I think it not should be very hard, but I will need some help from our SQL
> experts.
>
>>>
Denis,
>> I would make it transparent for the user giving ability to work with
LOCAL queries as well. How difficult is to support this?
I think it not should be very hard, but I will need some help from our SQL
experts.
>> Isn’t the goal of this task to support all SQL queries? Don’t get why
you
Hi Alex,
>> 1) Current implementation will collect info and cancel only "TwoStep"
>> queries.
>>Should we also support LOCAL queries?
>>
I would make it transparent for the user giving ability to work with LOCAL
queries as well. How difficult is to support this?
>> 2) Should we also suppor
Any feedback, please?
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 9:38 PM, Alexey Kuznetsov
wrote:
> Hi All!
>
> I prepared first version https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4436
> (SQL: create API to collect list of running SQL queries and cancel them).
>
> Please review it and give a feedback: http://rev
Hi All!
I prepared first version https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4436
(SQL: create API to collect list of running SQL queries and cancel them).
Please review it and give a feedback:
http://reviews.ignite.apache.org/ignite/review/IGNT-CR-84
But also I have following questions:
1) Cur
