Alexey,
Any reason why you propose this only for raw data? I think this should be
an option for binary marshaller (probably per type). If we also add special
methods to Binarylizable, then they should be applied to both raw and
non-raw data.
BTW, there are couple other tickets regarding this, and
Dmitriy,
Not arrays, just primitives.
Using special binary representation, ints and longs can be represented by
1-9 bytes, depending on their cardinality.
I want to add such implementation in raw binary API to help implementing
custom serializers.
2017-09-29 15:12 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan
Alexey, are you talking about arrays of ints and longs?
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 3:29 AM, Alexei Scherbakov <
alexey.scherbak...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I notices we do not have support for packed ints and longs in raw binary
> API [1] [2]
>
> Such methods are essential for implementing effi
Guys,
I notices we do not have support for packed ints and longs in raw binary
API [1] [2]
Such methods are essential for implementing efficient custom compression
schemes.
Their addition can simplify implementing custom serializers for the cases
then default binary marshaller is not enough, wit
