I think it is not a bad change. How about we open a ticket and mark it as
“newbie”, so new community members could get started with it.
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 4:52 AM, Denis Magda wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank for pointing out to this issue. Local port range set to 0 presently
> doesn't work at least
Hi,
Thank for pointing out to this issue. Local port range set to 0
presently doesn't work at least for TcpCommunicationSpi and
TcpDiscoverySpi. However SPIs support it.
In my understanding the condition has to changed to the following one
(from < to <=).
x = port; x*<=* port + range
But
