Congrats!
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 11:09 AM Norbert Luksa
wrote:
>
> Congratulations, Shant!
>
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 10:55 AM Laszlo Gaal
> wrote:
>
> > Congratulations, Shant!
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 9:39 AM Tamas Mate wrote:
> >
> > > Congrats, Shant!
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 14,
Congrats, Norbert!
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 8:35 PM Zoltán Borók-Nagy wrote:
>
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Impala has
> invited Norbert Luksa to become a committer and we are pleased to announce
> that they have accepted.
> Congratulations and welcome, Norbert!
.
Jeszy
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 1:50 PM Quanlong Huang wrote:
>
> Hi Gabor,
>
> IMO, the change log is too detailed to be readable for users. There're no
> any highlights. It's hard for users to find significant changes. A
> summarized doc about new features and significant
Congrats Quanlong!
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 7:57 AM Jim Apple wrote:
>
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Impala has invited
> Quanlong Huang to become a PMC member and we are pleased to announce
> that they have accepted.
>
> Congratulations and welcome, Quanlong!
I'd try to make it if the meeting was in a Europe-friendly time out of
interest, but I don't feel I have much to contribute - probably not
worth a reschedule by itself.
On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 at 00:21, Lars Volker wrote:
>
> I'm good with that time too. However, I have not seen interest from folks
>
until users started running queries.
>
> I0820 19:45:25.106437 25474 statestore.cc:568] Preparing initial
> catalog-update topic update for impalad@XXX:22000. Size = 1.45 MB
>
> Brock
>
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 1:18 PM, Jeszy wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > If it happen
Hey,
If it happens shortly after a restart, there is a fair chance you're
crashing while processing the initial catalog topic update. Statestore
logs will tell you how big that was (it takes more memory to process
it than the actual size of the update).
If this is the case, it should also be
Congrats Quanlong!
On 17 August 2018 at 19:51, Csaba Ringhofer wrote:
> Congrats!
>
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 6:32 PM, Philip Zeyliger
> wrote:
>
>> Congrats!
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 9:29 AM Tim Armstrong
>> wrote:
>>
>> > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Impala has
I think we should include it in 3.1, with the feature disabled by default
(to not break on a minor upgrade), but recommend enabling it in docs and
make it enabled by default in 4.0.
On 11 June 2018 at 10:23, Jim Apple wrote:
> Any more thoughts? This question is for everyone in the Impala
It's addressed in IMPALA-5615.
On 2018. Apr 2., Mon at 7:56, Jim Apple wrote:
> I feel like I saw a similar JIRA and patch recently. Is this addressed In
> another ticket?
>
> If not, it feels like a P2 to me: it’s not exactly incorrect, but I expect
> it means that some
IIUC, every row scanned in a partitioned hash join (both sides) is sent
across the network (an exchange on HASH(key)). The targets of this exchange
are nodes that have data locality with the left side of the join. Why does
Impala do it that way?
Since all rows are sent across the network anyway,
11 matches
Mail list logo