Re: Podling Report Reminder - March 2019

2019-03-01 Thread Willem Jiang
Yeah, it's quit import for the others to know what's going on of the project by following the mailing list. Please try your best to avoid the internal discussion to build a transparent community. Willem Jiang Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 11:34 PM Christofer Dutz wr

Re: Podling Report Reminder - March 2019

2019-03-01 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > I will remove the sentence ` We'd like to try to release the first binary > version under the guide of mentors in the next month`. I’m not sure that removing it answers Chris’s question, either this is planned and has been discussed off list or not. Please try and have all discussion on t

Podling Report Reminder - March 2019

2019-03-01 Thread jmclean
Dear podling, This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly board report. The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 20 March 2019, 10:30 am PDT. The report for your podling will form a

Re: Podling Report Reminder - March 2019

2019-03-01 Thread Christofer Dutz
I'm totally fine with that version :-) And a big fat +1 for posting summaries for PRs. Chris Outlook für Android herunterladen From: Xiangdong Huang Sent: Friday, March 1, 2019 4:46:35 PM To: dev@iotdb.apache.org Subject: Re: Podling Repo

Re: Podling Report Reminder - March 2019

2019-03-01 Thread Xiangdong Huang
Hi Chrirs, Thanks. I will remove the sentence ` We'd like to try to release the first binary version under the guide of mentors in the next month`. It is my fault to add it on the report (because I think it says "Please feel free to add your own commentary", so I added my commentary...). Indeed,

Re: Podling Report Reminder - March 2019

2019-03-01 Thread Christofer Dutz
Hi All, One thing I have noticed recently that almost all discussion has moved either to the review list or is not happening on any list. That's not good for including new contributors. At least I no longer have an idea what you guys are working on, so I'll probably just concentrate on reviewin

Re: Podling Report Reminder - March 2019

2019-03-01 Thread Xiangdong Huang
Hi, The following is the draft. IoTDB IoTDB is a data store for managing large amounts of time series data such as timestamped data from IoT sensors in industrial applications. IoTDB has been incubating since 2018-11-18. Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:

Re: How to mark SonarLint issues as False Positive or Won't Fix

2019-03-01 Thread Christofer Dutz
But in general, you should be able to log-in to SonarQube and mark something as "won't fix" or "false-positive" ... Chris Am 01.03.19, 09:32 schrieb "江天" : Hello, I have seen some sonar issues that are not really issues. Leaving them as they are makes it harder to find the tru

Re: How to mark SonarLint issues as False Positive or Won't Fix

2019-03-01 Thread 江天
Thanks for your advice. This is indeed a better way. Tian Jiang > 在 2019年3月1日,下午4:48,Julian Feinauer 写道: > > Hi Tian, > > I would prefer to use the annotation: > > @java.lang.SuppressWarnings("squid:S00112") > > And add a comment in code. > This is more robust then doing it in the ui (when c

Re: How to mark SonarLint issues as False Positive or Won't Fix

2019-03-01 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi Tian, I would prefer to use the annotation: @java.lang.SuppressWarnings("squid:S00112") And add a comment in code. This is more robust then doing it in the ui (when code is resubmitted or something, sometimes the warnings reoccur). Julian Am 01.03.19, 09:32 schrieb "江天" : Hello,

How to mark SonarLint issues as False Positive or Won't Fix

2019-03-01 Thread 江天
Hello, I have seen some sonar issues that are not really issues. Leaving them as they are makes it harder to find the true positives, so I want to mark them as False Positive or Won't Fix. However, I can’t find the option. Is this because I do not have the privilege? Tian Jiang