Hi,
Currently, the snapshot is triggered every xxx lines in mlog.txt.
When meeting 20M timeseries, the default 10k lines will cause too many
snapshot, which will block the creating.
However, if we enlarge the condition to 1M, the last 1M will take about 6s to
recover, about 160K per second.
So
Hi,
+1 from committer :
I checked:
- Incubating in name
- Download links
- Signatures and hashes
- ASF headers in all source files
- Compiling from source
- LICENSE and NOTICE
- Start bin distributuion in Mac openJDK11
statements executed successfully:
Insert into root.sg.d0(time,s0) valu
Hi,
+1 from committer : )
I checked:
- Incubating in name
- Download links
- Signatures and hashes
- DISCLAIMER
- Git tag
- ASF headers in all source files
- Compiling from source
- LICENSE and NOTICE
- Start in mac
Best,
---
Zesong Sun
School of Software,
Hi,
+1
The source release:
incubating in name [ok]
apache headers [ok]
signatures and hashes [ok]
DISCLAIMER [ok]
LICENSE and NOTICE [ok]
no jar files [ok]
could compile from source: ./mvnw.sh clean install [ok]
The binary distribution:
version number in CLI [ok]
signatures and hashes [ok]
start
Hi all,
We can discuss the issue of releasing v0.10.0 RC4 here.
This is the 4th release candidate of v0.10.0, I send the vote mail after a
6 hours cooling-off period after uploading the files to the dev SVN repo...
I hope this RC has no issues anymore...
Of course, if there is -1, I will release
Hi all,
Welcome (well, once again and again) to verify the release of Apache IoTDB
(incubating) 0.10.0 (RC4).
Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.10.0 has been staged under [1] and it’s time to
vote
on accepting it for release. All Maven artifacts are available under [2].
RC3 fixes the following is
Hi,
the Testcontainers Project solves this extremely efficient und elegant and has
an nice integration to Junit.
And Controls the complete lifecycle of the containers:
https://www.testcontainers.org/test_framework_integration/junit_4/
Julian
Am 17.06.20, 10:00 schrieb "Xiangdong Huang" :
Hi Julian,
> Especially with TestContainers it would be very easy to startup an IoTDB
Server in an container and perform some testing against it.
Yes if we can run iotdb instance in containers for test, it could be fine.
But the concern is that can it work together with JUnit and TravisCI?
Bes
Probabl.y we could try to set up integration tests fort hat.
Especially with TestContainers it would be very easy to startup an IoTDB Server
in an container and perform some testing against it.
Julian
Am 17.06.20, 09:13 schrieb "李天安" :
Hi,
In the sync tool, the receiver will compare t
Hi,
In the sync tool, the receiver will compare the versions of IoTDB with the
sender's and rejects the synchronization task if the versions are different.
In the load tool, the engine will check the version number of tsfile and will
reject the load operation if the version doesn't match with
10 matches
Mail list logo
